Wednesday, August 13, 2008

John Remington Graham A07-1923_Aug08

  • A05-201, Teresa M. Graham, Appellant, vs. Independent School District 625, a/k/a St. Paul Public School District, et al., Respondents.
  • C4-97-396, Claryce Darling Graham, Appellant, vs. Jeffrey A. Lukens, M.D., et al., Respondents, Elizabeth Elfstrand, M.D., et al., Respondents, Linda F. Carson, M.D., et al., Respondents.
  • A06-1862, Jamaul Wendell Graham, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent.
  • A07-1923, John Remington Graham, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. (August 2008, Affirmed. Order opinion.)





  • Monday, July 21, 2008

    Gouldee,Krogstad, Lazaryan_Election-EthicsJudges_Retired_Holter-Cohen-R.Anderson_

    Hi Sharon,

    Glad to see you doing O.K. Did you see this?:

    http://minnlawyer.blogspot.com/2008/06/voted-out-holters-efforts-to-sit-on.html

    Holter is not going to be allowed to sit as judge anymore, a win for all Northern Minnesota Voters and
    Native Americans.

    Just love Bobbys Blog If Nancy needs help in the non lawyer judge Sharon Scarrella has been there In re: Scarrella for Assoc. Justice 221NW2nd562, Published to Libel the citizenery contrary to Voting Rights Act
    -http://www.blogger.com/profile/15162793180809042494
    Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

    city employee:
    I went down to file as a candidate for judge, and the Secretary of State would not take my application.

    It was filmed and aired on the TV show Inside Insight. The video will be posted on the web (probably this week). Federal lawsuit getting written against the state for denying me my right to run.

    As far as stopping the St. Paul city council. Those pleadings WILL be served this week.

    Bob will have the lawsuit(s)BEFORE the city does, and the minute the city is served, he can post the info on the web.

    John-Krogstad Ethics Complaint against former Chief Justice Russell Anderson dtd.7/10/08

    Ron Branson-JAIL_ Judicial Watch_JUDGES

    By Ron Branson - National J.A.I.L. CIC
    Below is a short blurb about protecting our California judges from the public. In order to gain the significance of their words, one must understand their buzz words, so I will translate the below for you. First off, Pete Wilson was a former Republican governor of California, and Gray Davis was the immediate former Democratic governor of California. So what we are seeing proposed here is the participation of
    So J.A.I.L set out to shine the light of exposure of the judges and successfully brought them to the forefront of publicity. In those days search engines revealed no websites about judges with the exception one set up by the judges themselves complaining that they were being deprived of sufficient salaries to meet the excellent services they were providing the publicboth major political http://www.kcra.com/news/16875274/detail.html
  • Open Records at Judicial Watch - Learn more about Judicial Watch's open records work and to learn more about open records laws.

  • Judicial Financial Disclosure Project – Search financial disclosure reports for all Supreme Court justices, appellate court and district court judges.

  • Ethics Complaints – Get more information about ethics complaints and other actions taken by Judicial Watch to promote integrity in Congress.

    Get more information Judicial Watch

  • Wednesday, June 18, 2008

    Pastor Rick Scarborough v. Judge Alex Kozinski

    Our mission is to mobilize pastors and values voters to be proactive in restoring Judeo-Christian values in our nation.
    http://vbuttons.com/click.php?em_id=
    REGISTER TO VOTE TELL-A-FRIEND CONTRIBUTE

    Dear Sharon,

    I am disgusted by recent revelations the chief justice of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had posted pornographic pictures and images on his Web site.

    If you missed the coverage last week, the Los Angeles Times reported that Judge Alex Kozinski had posted --on his publicly accessible Web site--content which included sexual-fetish videos and bestiality images. Kozinski's excuse? He wasn't aware the public could access those particular pages on his site.

    There was no apology and no remorse.

    The fact that he didn't know the public could see the posted content is irrelevant! The real question is, why is a federal judge collecting pornography and displaying it anywhere? And who did he post the images for? His friends, his family, his colleagues?

    A Reagan-appointee, Kozinski has been presiding over a highly publicized obscenity trial, which he suspended for 48 hours at the prosecution's request. The district attorney handling the case said he saw a potential conflict of interest for a judge with a sexually explicit Web site to hear this case.

    This is worse than a simple conflict of interest! This is an incredible moral lapse! It demonstrates a huge lack of decency and morality and it should disqualify Judge Kosinski from further service on the federal bench.

    Even liberal California U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein stated, "If this is true, this is unacceptable for a federal court judge." Unacceptable it most certainly is.

    Kozinski has a reputation as an extreme civil libertarian. He had previously blocked efforts to put filters on the computers of court administrators, to keep them from accessing internet pornography.

    While we pray for Judge Kozinski and his family, for the sake of decency and the integrity of the federal courts, the judge should resign.

    Click here to support Vision America Action's efforts to help return America to Judeo-Christian morality.


    Another Attempt to Stop CA Homosexual Marriage

    Liberty Counsel -- a national conservative legal association that has fought for traditional values in our nation's courts for years -- has entered the fray in California.

    Last week, the group filed a petition asking the California Court of Appeals to block the issuance of marriage licenses to homosexual couples.

    According to Liberty Counsel, the Court of Appeals has regained jurisdiction over homosexual marriage cases. The Supreme Court has directed the Court of Appeals to take "further action consistent with this opinion."

    However, the Supreme Court - which ordered the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples -- only ruled on two laws, and Liberty Counsel contends that a myriad of other marriage regulations still exist in California and any changes must take place in the legislature.

    I agree!

    In our government, there is a separation of powers for a reason. Our nation's system of checks and balances was designed to keep the tyranny of the few from circumventing representative government and democracy. But, little by little, we have neglected these protections, and now we see these limits consistently ignored.

    I encourage you to join with us in support of the marriage amendment that will appear on the Nov. 4 general election ballot in California. This state amendment will place protections for traditional marriage in the California Constitution. It states, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

    Click here make a donation to Vision America Action as we work to educate the public about these issues and the power of the people to stand against judicial tyranny.


    Obama Supports Partial Birth Abortion

    "The first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act," Barack Obama stated following a July 17, 2007, speech to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

    One year later, he hasn't changed his mind.

    The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) was introduced in Congress following the April 19, 2007, Supreme Court decision upholding a Congressional ban on partial birth abortion.

    It was reintroduced this year.

    FOCA would create an absolute right to abortion that would override any federal, state or local law that simply "interfered with" that right -- no matter how compelling the justification for the law.

    Denise M. Burke, vice president and legal director for American United for Life, sees FOCA as a real danger to women and the unborn.

    "FOCA creates a new and dangerously radical 'right,' Burke wrote in a commentary about the legislation. "It establishes the right to abortion as a 'fundamental right,' elevating it to the same status as the right to vote and the right to free speech, which unlike the abortion license, are specifically mentioned in the U.S. Constitution."

    "Critically, the U.S. Supreme Court has never (in Roe v. Wade or any subsequent decision) defined abortion as a fundamental constitutional right," Burke said. "FOCA goes beyond any Supreme Court decision in enshrining unlimited abortion-on-demand into American law."

    We will continue to monitor this dangerous piece of legislation and alert you should action need to be taken to stop it. Click here to help Vision America Action in its vital efforts to defend the unborn - the most defenseless of God's children.


    Fairness Doctrine Is Unfair

    Actions are being taken in Washington D.C. to prevent the Federal Communications Commission from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, which mandated that broadcasters airing opinion programs must also grant air-time to those expressing an opposing viewpoint. The Fairness doctrine was in effect from1949 to 1987.

    The Broadcast Freedom Act would ensure no future president could regulate the airwaves in this way without an act of Congress.

    "Bringing back the Fairness Doctrine would amount to government control over political views expressed on the public airwaves. It is dangerous to suggest that the government should be in the business of rationing free speech," U.S. Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) said. He introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act a year ago.

    Currently, the bill is bottled up in committee. Pence has gathered 194 signatures (out of a required 218) on a discharge petition, a maneuver that would force the bill out of committee and onto the House floor for a vote. On Wednesday, Pence challenged House Democrats to "declare their independence, stand for freedom and sign the Discharge Petition for Broadcast Freedom before the 4th of July."

    Since conservatives dominate talk radio any attempt to re-impose the Fairness Doctrine would be an attempt to muzzle and stifle conservative speech.

    "The idea of the government being the censor of what happens on the radio is one of the more bizarre things I have heard," U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) said. "Let's make a permanent law so we don't have government censorship of our airwaves."

    Select here to contact your representative and senators, urging support for the Broadcast Freedom Act.

    Click here to help Vision America Action oppose the imposition of liberal censorship over talk radio.

    I remain...Your servant and friend,

    Pastor Rick Scarborough

    Vision America Action - http://www.visionamericaaction.org

    Sunday, April 6, 2008

    Judge Russell Anderson-Judicial/Electoral Abuse

    This blogger has called for Russell Andersons resignation for criminal conspiracy

    A former judge accuses retiring Supreme Court Chief Justice Russell Anderson of playing politics

    Judgment Call

    By Paul Demko

    When Russell Anderson announced last month that he'd be stepping down in June as chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, the reviews of his two-year tenure were glowing.

    "We have appreciated his wise leadership of the court and his insistence on the impartiality of the judiciary," editorialized the Pioneer Press.

    The Star Tribune was no less effusive. "Russell Anderson's relatively brief tenure as Minnesota's chief justice belies the lasting impact he'll have on Minnesota courts and those who seek justice in them," the newspaper's editorial board cheered.

    Gov. Tim Pawlenty hailed Anderson as an "extraordinary leader and public servant."

    In particular, the 65-year-old chief justice was applauded for his efforts to keep partisan politics and special interest money out of judicial races. "Nobody wants somebody calling balls and strikes before the pitch is thrown," Anderson has been quoted more than once as saying.

    But up in Anderson's hometown of Bemidji, Terrance Holter experienced a very different reaction to the news. He wondered if his strange, two-year odyssey through judicial politics might have something do with Anderson's retirement plans.

    Holter and Anderson have known each other for most of their lives. They both grew up around Bemidji, the northern Minnesota town of 12,000 that's best known for its statues of Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox. Holter was two years behind Anderson at Bemidji High School.

    After graduation, their lives continued to converge. Both eventually established law practices in the Bemidji area, with Anderson advancing to become the county attorney. Each was tapped in the early 1980s by Gov. Al Quie to serve as a judge in the Ninth Judicial District.

    But Holter's tenure as a judge came to an abrupt end two years ago when he was defeated at the polls, and he blames his judicial exile in large part on meddling by the chief justice.

    "This has been such a kick in the teeth all the way around," says Holter. "I wouldn't try to pretend I'm not angry about the whole thing."

    ON THE LAST DAY of candidate filing in July 2006, Judge Terrance Holter was on vacation. The 26-year veteran of the bench spent the afternoon visiting relatives. He figured he had little to worry about. After all, he hadn't faced electoral opposition since the end of his first term on the bench more than two decades earlier. Even then, Holter's opponent was a perennial gadfly who posed little threat at the polls.

    But that July evening, the veteran jurist received some surprising news via a phone call from a fellow Ninth Judicial District judge. Not only would Holter face opposition in the fall elections, but two different candidates had filed to run against him.

    One was Tim Tingelstad, a conservative Christian who wanted to bring religion into the courtroom.

    But the real shocker was Holter's other opponent: John Melbye. For the previous four years, Melbye had served as Holter's law clerk. They'd had an amicable relationship, partnering up on the golf course and exchanging presents at Christmas.

    Unbeknownst to Holter, Melbye had resigned via letter and cleaned out his office over the weekend.

    "I couldn't believe it," Holter says. "I thought, What a snake." (Melbye declined to comment.)

    Holter quickly realized that he had no clue how to run a political campaign. And the Ninth Judicial District presents a particularly bewildering electoral landscape, stretching over 17 counties from International Falls on the Canadian border to Brainerd in the center of the state. Although Holter could preside over cases in any of the 17 counties, more than 90 percent of his work was in the Beltrami County Courthouse in Bemidji. "There are many counties in the district that I've never set foot in as a judge," he says.

    When Holter returned to his office a couple of days later, he found a phone message from local attorney Rebecca Anderson. She wanted to help with his campaign. At the time, this seemed like a fortuitous development. Not only did Anderson have strong ties in the legal community throughout much of the Ninth Judicial District, she also happened to be the daughter of the chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Russell Anderson. In fact, Holter says, Rebecca Anderson told him that she was calling at her father's behest.

    "She said, 'My dad called me last night and said you've got to help Terry,'" Holter recalls. "I thought that's great. You've got the Supreme Court chief's daughter. She says she knows how to run a campaign."

    Rebecca Anderson immediately signed on to be the co-chair of Holter's campaign. But as Holter describes it, her stewardship of the re-election effort was a disaster from the outset. She never made good on promises to deliver endorsement letters from prominent local citizens. She also failed to set up appearances at church suppers and county fairs where Holter could hobnob with constituents.

    Meanwhile Melbye was running an extremely vigorous campaign. The son-in-law of cable magnates, Melbye spent roughly $25,000 of his own money, ensuring that this would be among the most heavily funded campaign in the history of the Ninth Judicial District.

    "I had never seen a judicial campaign like this before," says Carl Drahos, a veteran Bemidji attorney. "I just hadn't seen that kind of campaign money flowing in my life."

    Owing to the size of the district, and the low level of interest in judicial races, money has the potential to play an outsized role in election outcomes. "I don't want to say it's unfair, but I think it's a risk of the result being more a fact of exposure and spending money to campaign as opposed to strictly the qualifications," says Jon Maturi, chief judge of the Ninth Judicial District.

    At the time of the 2006 race, most of the media's attention was focused on Tingelstad's candidacy. In the wake of an appeals court ruling striking down restrictions on partisanship in judicial campaigns, Tingelstad received the endorsement of the GOP, making him the state's first judicial candidate to have party backing. He also ran a campaign that promised to bring religion into the courtroom. His electoral slogan: "Justice is served when judges fear God and love the people."

    But voters in northwest Minnesota showed considerably less interest in Tingelstad. Holter and Melbye each garnered 39 percent of the vote in the primary election, with Tingelstad a distant third.

    The results didn't exactly bode well for the incumbent judge. Despite more than two decades on the bench and an opponent who had never tried a case in a courtroom, the race was a dead heat.

    The Holter campaign redoubled its efforts, enlisting prominent attorneys to write letters to the editor making the case for his re-election. "You can learn a lot during a clerkship, but not enough to take the seat you've served," wrote local lawyer Eric Shieferdecker. "Judges should be cut from stronger, more mature timber."

    But Rebecca Anderson failed to deliver the letter to the newspaper as promised, Holter claims. She also assured him that Polk County would be friendly territory, given that she'd attended high school in the area while her dad served as a district court judge. But Holter says she failed to set up a single campaign event in the area.

    Although Holter feared that her failure to follow through on such promises might cost him the campaign, he hesitated to confront her about the problems. After all, he didn't want to offend the daughter of the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.

    On election night Holter went to the movies to distract himself from the pending results. Around 10 p.m., he and his wife began tracking the tabulation online. From the outset, Melbye maintained a small lead. By about 1 a.m., it was clear Melbye would narrowly win the bench. He ultimately garnered 51 percent of the ballots, besting the incumbent by roughly 1,500 votes.

    Holter lost the election despite the fact that he carried his home turf—Beltrami County, where he'd tried the overwhelming majority of his cases over the prior 26 years—by a robust 62-38 margin. He also won neighboring Hubbard and Clearwater counties, where he'd occasionally worked over the years.

    Holter blames the loss in part on Rebecca Anderson's failures as a campaign co-chair. "She didn't do anything," the judge says.

    But Rebecca Anderson, who has since relocated to the Twin Cities, disputes Holter's characterization of her efforts. She points out that she was merely a volunteer trying to assist the campaign. "I felt horrible," she says of the election defeat. "My whole intent behind it was just to help Judge Holter."

    She also denies that her father asked her to get involved with the campaign. "I had told my dad that I was going to offer to help," she says. "I heard rumors about this, but no, my dad wasn't behind it. It was my decision."

    Russell Anderson declined to be interviewed for this article. But in a statement released to City Pages, a Supreme Court spokesman denied that Anderson asked his daughter to help Holter's campaign. "She was a lawyer practicing in the same town as the judge and offered without any prompting by the chief justice to help the judge gain reelection."

    SEVERAL WEEKS AFTER the disappointing election loss, Holter received a phone call from John Smith, then chief judge of the Ninth Judicial District. Smith suggested that Holter retire before his term expired at the end of the year—that way Holter could sign up to serve as a retired judge and fill in for jurists who were on vacation or medical leave.

    So just before Christmas, Holter turned in his resignation and filled out an application to serve as a retired judge. Because he'd lost the election, Holter would need special approval from the Minnesota Supreme Court, specifically Chief Justice Russell Anderson. No problem, Holter thought.

    But a couple of weeks later, Holter got word that Anderson wanted to sit on the application for six months while things "cool down."

    "It baffled me," Holter recalls. "There wasn't anything to cool down."

    In March, Holter got another call from Smith, who was hoping Holter would be able to fill in for him during an upcoming absence. Smith called Anderson to press him on Holter's pending application, but the chief justice didn't budge.

    In April, the judges of the Ninth Judicial District held their quarterly meeting. During the gathering, they passed a unanimous resolution supporting Holter's application to serve as a retired judge.

    Despite this show of support, Holter got word in June that Anderson wasn't going to accept his application.

    Bewildered by the decision, Holter lobbied various local officials to write to Anderson on his behalf. Among those who offered support: the Beltrami County attorney, the chief public defender for the Ninth Judicial District, a local representative of the American Civil Liberties Union, a Beltrami county commissioner, and several prominent local attorneys.

    "Judge Holter is a highly respected Judge in the Beltrami County area," wrote Sheriff Phil Hodapp. "Judge Holter is highly thought of by the law enforcement professionals who have worked with him over the past couple of decades."

    Anderson's response to each supporter was brief and free of sentiment. "It has been the policy of former Chief Justices to not appoint district court judges, defeated for re-election, to serve as retired judges," he wrote. "It is a policy I will continue."

    Finally, in September, Holter received a phone call from the chief justice. During the five-minute discussion, Anderson acknowledged that Holter had considerable support, but refused to back down from the decision, citing the potential for a public backlash if Holter was permitted to serve on the bench after being rejected at the polls.

    The phone conversation was civil, but the way events played out continued to gnaw at Holter. Unable to put the matter out of his mind, Holter wrote to Anderson directly. He laid out their numerous personal connections, from time spent as judicial colleagues to the intimate role Anderson's daughter played in Holter's campaign. Holter's main point was that the chief justice should recuse himself from the decision.

    "I have reason to believe that your decision was based, at least in part, on a personal animus toward me," Holter wrote. "However, even if that was not the case, you couldn't possibly have been neutral to me."

    The response from Anderson was silence. To this day, he refuses to sign off on Holter. In a statement to City Pages, Anderson reaffirmed his stance that judges who lose elections should not be allowed to serve as retired jurists. Holter is uncertain whether the decision will be open to reconsideration after Anderson steps down in June.

    In the meantime, Holter is trying to enjoy retirement. He spends his days reading, meeting friends for coffee, golfing, and supporting Bemidji State University sports teams. But the whole strange series of events continues to eat at him.

    "It just angers me the way the whole thing played out," he says. "I just can't rest easy."

    1 2 3 Full

    From the Author Archive

    Judge Russell Anderson-Judicial/Electoral Abuse

    Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella-Peterson has charged Russell Anderson


    with Criminal Conspiracy to exploit http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com triggering his "Murder" 21Sept00, COVA-03-0639

    Judge Gregg Johnson,Susan Haigh, Habitat Humanity - Google SearchTwin Cities Habitat for Humanity - Executive Team
    Susan Haigh served nine years as a Commissioner for Ramsey County. ... She is married to Judge Gregg Johnson. They have four daughters and reside in St. ...
    www.tchabitat.org/content/view/109




    Further his 1 year at Brainard State Hospital., Medical Bills unabated by former County Commissioner Susan Haigh, lawyer, married to now Chief Judge Gregg Johnson,who sits on the State Committment Panel, the Andersons Medical Bills at $1,000.00 daily for Sharon

    $94 thous and for Jim Anderson 365 Thousand acting in concort with Judge Russell Anderson fromer 9th Dist Judge

    Judgment Call - City Pages (Minneapolis/St. Paul)


    .




    Feature


    Issue — April 2, 2008




    A former judge accuses retiring Supreme Court Chief Justice Russell Anderson of playing politics


    Judgment Call


    By Paul Demko



    Chief Justice Russell Anderson will retire in June
    Chief Justice Russell Anderson will retire in June

    Image by the State Court Information Office

    Retired Judge Terrance Holter blames the chief justice, in part, for his ouster from the bench
    Retired Judge Terrance Holter blames the chief justice, in part, for his ouster from the bench

    Image by Paul Demko

    Judge John Melbye won a 2006 judicial electiondespite never having tried a case in court
    Judge John Melbye won a 2006 judicial electiondespite never having tried a case in court

    Image by Monte Draper

    When Russell Anderson announced last month that he'd be stepping down in June as chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, the reviews of his two-year tenure were glowing.


    "We have appreciated his wise leadership of the court and his insistence on the impartiality of the judiciary," editorialized the Pioneer Press.


    The Star Tribune was no less effusive. "Russell Anderson's relatively brief tenure as Minnesota's chief justice belies the lasting impact he'll have on Minnesota courts and those who seek justice in them," the newspaper's editorial board cheered.


    Gov. Tim Pawlenty hailed Anderson as an "extraordinary leader and public servant."


    In particular, the 65-year-old chief justice was applauded for his efforts to keep partisan politics and special interest money out of judicial races. "Nobody wants somebody calling balls and strikes before the pitch is thrown," Anderson has been quoted more than once as saying.


    But up in Anderson's hometown of Bemidji, Terrance Holter experienced a very different reaction to the news. He wondered if his strange, two-year odyssey through judicial politics might have something do with Anderson's retirement plans.


    Holter and Anderson have known each other for most of their lives. They both grew up around Bemidji, the northern Minnesota town of 12,000 that's best known for its statues of Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox. Holter was two years behind Anderson at Bemidji High School.


    After graduation, their lives continued to converge. Both eventually established law practices in the Bemidji area, with Anderson advancing to become the county attorney. Each was tapped in the early 1980s by Gov. Al Quie to serve as a judge in the Ninth Judicial District.


    But Holter's tenure as a judge came to an abrupt end two years ago when he was defeated at the polls, and he blames his judicial exile in large part on meddling by the chief justice.


    "This has been such a kick in the teeth all the way around," says Holter. "I wouldn't try to pretend I'm not angry about the whole thing."

    • • • • •


    ON THE LAST DAY of candidate filing in July 2006, Judge Terrance Holter was on vacation. The 26-year veteran of the bench spent the afternoon visiting relatives. He figured he had little to worry about. After all, he hadn't faced electoral opposition since the end of his first term on the bench more than two decades earlier. Even then, Holter's opponent was a perennial gadfly who posed little threat at the polls.


    But that July evening, the veteran jurist received some surprising news via a phone call from a fellow Ninth Judicial District judge. Not only would Holter face opposition in the fall elections, but two different candidates had filed to run against him.


    One was Tim Tingelstad, a conservative Christian who wanted to bring religion into the courtroom.


    But the real shocker was Holter's other opponent: John Melbye. For the previous four years, Melbye had served as Holter's law clerk. They'd had an amicable relationship, partnering up on the golf course and exchanging presents at Christmas.


    Unbeknownst to Holter, Melbye had resigned via letter and cleaned out his office over the weekend.


    "I couldn't believe it," Holter says. "I thought, What a snake." (Melbye declined to comment.)


    Holter quickly realized that he had no clue how to run a political campaign. And the Ninth Judicial District presents a particularly bewildering electoral landscape, stretching over 17 counties from International Falls on the Canadian border to Brainerd in the center of the state. Although Holter could preside over cases in any of the 17 counties, more than 90 percent of his work was in the Beltrami County Courthouse in Bemidji. "There are many counties in the district that I've never set foot in as a judge," he says.


    When Holter returned to his office a couple of days later, he found a phone message from local attorney Rebecca Anderson. She wanted to help with his campaign. At the time, this seemed like a fortuitous development. Not only did Anderson have strong ties in the legal community throughout much of the Ninth Judicial District, she also happened to be the daughter of the chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Russell Anderson. In fact, Holter says, Rebecca Anderson told him that she was calling at her father's behest.


    "She said, 'My dad called me last night and said you've got to help Terry,'" Holter recalls. "I thought that's great. You've got the Supreme Court chief's daughter. She says she knows how to run a campaign."


    Rebecca Anderson immediately signed on to be the co-chair of Holter's campaign. But as Holter describes it, her stewardship of the re-election effort was a disaster from the outset. She never made good on promises to deliver endorsement letters from prominent local citizens. She also failed to set up appearances at church suppers and county fairs where Holter could hobnob with constituents.


    Meanwhile Melbye was running an extremely vigorous campaign. The son-in-law of cable magnates, Melbye spent roughly $25,000 of his own money, ensuring that this would be among the most heavily funded campaign in the history of the Ninth Judicial District.


    "I had never seen a judicial campaign like this before," says Carl Drahos, a veteran Bemidji attorney. "I just hadn't seen that kind of campaign money flowing in my life."


    Owing to the size of the district, and the low level of interest in judicial races, money has the potential to play an outsized role in election outcomes. "I don't want to say it's unfair, but I think it's a risk of the result being more a fact of exposure and spending money to campaign as opposed to strictly the qualifications," says Jon Maturi, chief judge of the Ninth Judicial District.


    At the time of the 2006 race, most of the media's attention was focused on Tingelstad's candidacy. In the wake of an appeals court ruling striking down restrictions on partisanship in judicial campaigns, Tingelstad received the endorsement of the GOP, making him the state's first judicial candidate to have party backing. He also ran a campaign that promised to bring religion into the courtroom. His electoral slogan: "Justice is served when judges fear God and love the people."


    But voters in northwest Minnesota showed considerably less interest in Tingelstad. Holter and Melbye each garnered 39 percent of the vote in the primary election, with Tingelstad a distant third.


    The results didn't exactly bode well for the incumbent judge. Despite more than two decades on the bench and an opponent who had never tried a case in a courtroom, the race was a dead heat.


    The Holter campaign redoubled its efforts, enlisting prominent attorneys to write letters to the editor making the case for his re-election. "You can learn a lot during a clerkship, but not enough to take the seat you've served," wrote local lawyer Eric Shieferdecker. "Judges should be cut from stronger, more mature timber."


    But Rebecca Anderson failed to deliver the letter to the newspaper as promised, Holter claims. She also assured him that Polk County would be friendly territory, given that she'd attended high school in the area while her dad served as a district court judge. But Holter says she failed to set up a single campaign event in the area.


    Although Holter feared that her failure to follow through on such promises might cost him the campaign, he hesitated to confront her about the problems. After all, he didn't want to offend the daughter of the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.


    On election night Holter went to the movies to distract himself from the pending results. Around 10 p.m., he and his wife began tracking the tabulation online. From the outset, Melbye maintained a small lead. By about 1 a.m., it was clear Melbye would narrowly win the bench. He ultimately garnered 51 percent of the ballots, besting the incumbent by roughly 1,500 votes.


    Holter lost the election despite the fact that he carried his home turf—Beltrami County, where he'd tried the overwhelming majority of his cases over the prior 26 years—by a robust 62-38 margin. He also won neighboring Hubbard and Clearwater counties, where he'd occasionally worked over the years.


    Holter blames the loss in part on Rebecca Anderson's failures as a campaign co-chair. "She didn't do anything," the judge says.


    But Rebecca Anderson, who has since relocated to the Twin Cities, disputes Holter's characterization of her efforts. She points out that she was merely a volunteer trying to assist the campaign. "I felt horrible," she says of the election defeat. "My whole intent behind it was just to help Judge Holter."


    She also denies that her father asked her to get involved with the campaign. "I had told my dad that I was going to offer to help," she says. "I heard rumors about this, but no, my dad wasn't behind it. It was my decision."


    Russell Anderson declined to be interviewed for this article. But in a statement released to City Pages, a Supreme Court spokesman denied that Anderson asked his daughter to help Holter's campaign. "She was a lawyer practicing in the same town as the judge and offered without any prompting by the chief justice to help the judge gain reelection."

    • • • • •


    SEVERAL WEEKS AFTER the disappointing election loss, Holter received a phone call from John Smith, then chief judge of the Ninth Judicial District. Smith suggested that Holter retire before his term expired at the end of the year—that way Holter could sign up to serve as a retired judge and fill in for jurists who were on vacation or medical leave.


    So just before Christmas, Holter turned in his resignation and filled out an application to serve as a retired judge. Because he'd lost the election, Holter would need special approval from the Minnesota Supreme Court, specifically Chief Justice Russell Anderson. No problem, Holter thought.


    But a couple of weeks later, Holter got word that Anderson wanted to sit on the application for six months while things "cool down."


    "It baffled me," Holter recalls. "There wasn't anything to cool down."


    In March, Holter got another call from Smith, who was hoping Holter would be able to fill in for him during an upcoming absence. Smith called Anderson to press him on Holter's pending application, but the chief justice didn't budge.


    In April, the judges of the Ninth Judicial District held their quarterly meeting. During the gathering, they passed a unanimous resolution supporting Holter's application to serve as a retired judge.


    Despite this show of support, Holter got word in June that Anderson wasn't going to accept his application.


    Bewildered by the decision, Holter lobbied various local officials to write to Anderson on his behalf. Among those who offered support: the Beltrami County attorney, the chief public defender for the Ninth Judicial District, a local representative of the American Civil Liberties Union, a Beltrami county commissioner, and several prominent local attorneys.


    "Judge Holter is a highly respected Judge in the Beltrami County area," wrote Sheriff Phil Hodapp. "Judge Holter is highly thought of by the law enforcement professionals who have worked with him over the past couple of decades."


    Anderson's response to each supporter was brief and free of sentiment. "It has been the policy of former Chief Justices to not appoint district court judges, defeated for re-election, to serve as retired judges," he wrote. "It is a policy I will continue."


    Finally, in September, Holter received a phone call from the chief justice. During the five-minute discussion, Anderson acknowledged that Holter had considerable support, but refused to back down from the decision, citing the potential for a public backlash if Holter was permitted to serve on the bench after being rejected at the polls.


    The phone conversation was civil, but the way events played out continued to gnaw at Holter. Unable to put the matter out of his mind, Holter wrote to Anderson directly. He laid out their numerous personal connections, from time spent as judicial colleagues to the intimate role Anderson's daughter played in Holter's campaign. Holter's main point was that the chief justice should recuse himself from the decision.


    "I have reason to believe that your decision was based, at least in part, on a personal animus toward me," Holter wrote. "However, even if that was not the case, you couldn't possibly have been neutral to me."


    The response from Anderson was silence. To this day, he refuses to sign off on Holter. In a statement to City Pages, Anderson reaffirmed his stance that judges who lose elections should not be allowed to serve as retired jurists. Holter is uncertain whether the decision will be open to reconsideration after Anderson steps down in June.


    In the meantime, Holter is trying to enjoy retirement. He spends his days reading, meeting friends for coffee, golfing, and supporting Bemidji State University sports teams. But the whole strange series of events continues to eat at him.


    "It just angers me the way the whole thing played out," he says. "I just can't rest easy."


    1 2 3 Full



    From the Author Archive


    Paul Demko

    Swindler is back after two years in prison — Gabriel Francois stands accused of stiffing day laborers (Mar 12, 2008)

    Judge and wife allege harassment by Minneapolis police — James and Lois Cannon seek apology from cops (Feb 27, 2008)

    Maplewood Follies — Polarizing politics in the Twin Cities' most dysfunctional suburb (Feb 20, 2008)

    St. Paul's High Bridge: Suicide Hot Spot — Ever since the original High Bridge was built in 1889, it's been a magnet for people seeking to end their lives (Feb 6, 2008)

    Minneapolis civil rights department being decimated from within — In less than a year, Michael Jordan has dismantled the city agency responsible for upholding civil rights (Jan 23, 2008)









    A former judge accuses retiring Supreme Court Chief Justice Russell Anderson of playing politics (Apr 2, 2008)



    Pending legislation would help veterans get treatment instead of prison time (Mar 26, 2008)











    Monday, March 17, 2008

    Affidavit of Prejudice Eric Magnuson re: MS2.724

    The undersigned and the voting public have heinously been denied "due process" access to the employment of Judges re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562, Sharon Anderson ran against Justice Sheran, Amdahl, Eric Magnuson clerked for, probably wrote the Illegal Opinon to keep non-lawyers from the Justice System?
    re: www.sharonanderson.org www.sharon4anderson.org Clerk Fred Grittner acting as a Judge 1988 to denGrittnerJud89.jpg (image)y "due process"
    Defrauding America
    Candidate Profile FCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com
    LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews,
    press releases, Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money Laundering andknowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidsecurities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, Image:WritPro06 26.pdf - Wikimedia Commons before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in

    Sharon4Judge