SharonsSlideShare

SharonsFacebook

www.facebook.com

Sharon's Favorites

Loading...

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

OpenLetterAmyKlobuchar_AlFrankentoConfirmNeilGorsuchUSSD



                                       OPEN LETTER TO DFL SENATORS

                                TO CONFIRM THE USSC NEIL GORSUCH

                             Tues.4Apr2017                       

                TO THE ABOVE NAMED; Specifically MN Senators Amy Klobuchar and Al Frankin DFL
 
In the Matter of CONFIRMATION OF REPUBLICAN NOMINEE NEIL GORSUCH AND 
 DFL LAWYERS IN THE US SENATE
                            MUST CONFIRM THIS HIGHLY QUALIFIED JUDGE TO THE USSC COURT
 
                                 
 
                               ISSUES FOR MN SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR, LICENSED LAWYER FROM MINNESOTA.
                              AFFIANTS WIDOW MRS. SHARON ANDERSON AND BILL DAHN
Swearingin
QUITAM RELATORS.
                               must bring to Sen. Amy Klobuchar memory that Amy as former Hennepin Co. Attorney who successfully prosecuted the Gay Judge Roland Amundson, for Stealin from a Vuneralbe Adult.
                             We  ie Sharon and Bill attended the Court hearings 20 yrs ago, it was brought to our attention that the Gay Judge had adopted 4 boys from Russia.

Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Gorsuch_Supreme_Court_nomination
Jump to Confirmation hearings - Democratic Senators repeatedly criticized Gorsuch for a case where the Tenth Circuit ruled in favor of a truck driver who ...

Confirmation Watch: Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Gorsuch ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/gorsuch-confirmation.html
1 day ago - The Senate Judiciary Committee, in a party-line, 11-to-9 vote, sent the nomination of Judge NeilM. Gorsuch for the Supreme Court to the full Senate for consideration. Democrats now seem to have the votes to filibuster Judge Gorsuch’s nomination. ... The tenor of the Judiciary ...                           
                      

Judge Goes From Behind Bench to Behind Bars - ABC News

abcnews.go.com/Nightline/LegalCenter/story?id=1686853
Mar 4, 2006 - In his 11 years as an appeals court judge in Minnesota, Roland Amundson faced down robbers, rapists, and murderers, and sent them to ...

MPR: Former appellate judge pleads guilty

news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/200204/01_stawickie_amundson/
Apr 1, 2002 - Former Court of Appeals Judge Roland Amundson pleaded guilty to five felony counts of theft by swindle Monday. But he told the judge he ...
 
 

To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 4/3/2017 4:08:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Contact your Senator TODAY!
 
Help the Committee to Defend the President have President Trump's back, defend him from attacks, and re-elect him in 2020!
Dear Sharon:

President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch's confirmation vote is THIS WEEK.

After the delay of Obamacare repeal – you and I must deliver a BIG victory for President Trump this week.

Will you help pressure your United States Senator by calling – RIGHT NOW – and demanding the Senate confirm Judge Gorsuch THIS WEEK?

Click the special button below to use our lookup tool and find your Senators' numbers so you can call them and urge them to CONFIRM JUDGE GORSUCH NOW!

 Click here to find your Senators'
numbers and call now! 

Tell your Senators to confirm Judge Gorsuch!

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), *** Durbin (D-IL), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) have pledge to filibuster Judge Gorsuch – attempting to deal President Trump a devastating defeat.

The Committee to Defend the President is leading the charge to generate up to 1,000,000 phone calls to the Senate this week – demanding Gorsuch's confirmation.

A full Senate Vote is expected by this Friday! Here is the situation:

Under current Senate rules, 60 votes are required to break any filibuster promised by Senator Schumer and the National Democrats. There are 52 Republican members in the Senate, and at least 3 Democrats have said they will vote for Judge Gorsuch's confirmation and vote to break their colleagues filibuster.

To confirm Judge Gorsuch you and I must fight hard for one of these to outcomes:

  1. Five more Democrats must vote to stop the filibuster so the full Senate can vote for confirmation; or
  2. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) must use the so-called "nuclear option" and change Senate rules so that unlimited debate can end and Judge Gorsuch can be confirmed with a simple majority of 51 votes.
Click the special button below to use our lookup tool and find your Senators' numbers so you can call them and urge them to CONFIRM JUDGE GORSUCH NOW!

 Click here to find your Senators'
numbers and call now! 

Tell your Senators to confirm Judge Gorsuch!

It's critical you call your U.S. Senators IMMEDIATELY and demand a vote to confirm Judge Gorsuch. One more thing: To generate a massive amount of phone calls to the Senate – upwards of 1 million – is very expensive. Would you consider making a one-time, special gift of $5 – or as much as $35 – to help the Committee to Defend the President to expand our fight to confirm Judge Gorsuch?

 DONATE 
Any amount of help will be put directly toward the fight to defend President Trump and Confirm Judge Gorsuch. Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,
Senator Ted Harvey
Chairman, Committee to Defend the President













Help the Committee to Defend the President have President Trump's back, defend him from attacks, and re-elect him in 2020!


Paid for by the
Committee to Defend The President

Not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee
www.CommitteeToDefendThePresident.com

Use of the name and likeness of any candidate, officeholder, or other individual is for the purpose of this PACs political communication only and IN NO WAY indicates any authorization by, affiliation with, direction from, or endorsement by that person of any kind.

Contributions are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes and will be used in connection with federal elections. Contributions from corporations, foreign nationals or entities are prohibited.

Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in a calendar year. When making a contribution, you verify the following statements are true and accurate: This contribution is made from my own funds and will not be reimbursed by any other person or entity. This contribution is made by a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent US resident and not by a corporation, union, national bank or federal government contractor.

This message was intended for: sharon4anderson@aol.com
You were added to the system October 28, 2016.
For more information click here. Update your preferences
Unsubscribe | Unsubscribe via email

 


www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com


LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw Sharons

www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com


www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
_
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"

including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See:
Quon
v. Arch.  


Thursday, October 6, 2016

Monday, October 3, 2016

Dr.RichardCorderoDonaldTrump4USPresidentJudicialDisciplineReform

NOTEIf  in spite  of  all the  effort  to circumvent  the  ‘glitch’ in  word  processing or  emailing  software that  creates  “joinedwords”in my emails(>ol2:426§C),  this  email has  them,  kindly overlook  them  and  let  me  know  at  Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net  and  CorderoRic@yahoo.com



Proposal  for  production by 
Donald  Trump  of  his  tax  returns
and
Sec.  Clinton  of her  30,000  deleted emails
on  ABC Good  Morning  America
at  8:05 a.m.  on  Saturday, October  8;
and  for  denouncing unaccountable  judges’  riskless wrongdoing;
launching  the  media  investigation  of 
the  two unique  national  stories of
President  Obama-Justice  Sotomayor concealment of assets and 
Federal  Judiciary-NSA  interception of  emails;  and
calling  for  nationally televised  hearings  on  judges’  wrongdoing



By

Dr.  Richard Cordero,  Esq.
Ph.D., University  of  Cambridge, England
M.B.A.,  University  of Michigan  Business  School
D.E.A.,  La  Sorbonne, Paris

Judicial  Discipline Reform
New York  City 

Visit  the  website  at,  and  subscribe to  its  series of  articles  and  letters  thus:
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org >+New  or  Users >Add  New

Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, 
CorderoRic
@yahoo.comDrCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, 
Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net



If  you  believe that  judges’  are  held  unaccountable and  risklessly dispense with dueprocess and equal protection  of  the  law for  their  convenience and  gain,  depriving  you,  your  family,  friends, and  the  rest  of  us  in  our  country  of  our  property, liberty,  and  the  rights  and  duties  that  shape  our  lives,  forward this  email  to  both  candidates.

Copy  and  paste  in  the  To:  line  of  your  forwarding  email  this bloc  of  email  addresses:


This is  your  opportunity to  denounce  judges’  unaccountability  and  riskless wrongdoing.  Take  action!  Share, post,  and  republish this  email  in its  entirety  as widely  as  possible and  become  a producer  of  an event  that  can change  the  campaign and  decide  the election.



Mr.  Donald  J.  Trump
Donald  J.  Trump  for  President, Inc.
725  Fifth  Avenue
New  York,  NY  10022


Dear  Mr.  Trump,

In your  first  presidential debate,  you  challenged Sec.  Clinton  to  produce  her  30,000  deleted emails  in  exchange for  your  production of  your  tax  returns.  While  she  did  not  take  up  your  challenge,  she  did  not  turn  it  down  either. 

This opens  the  opportunity for  you  to  raise  the  stakes  by  making  a  national  announcement on  tweets,  emails, at  rallies,  and  through  Gov.  Pence  at  his  vice  presidential  debate that  will  build  up  enormous expectation  and  focus  the  attention on  you: 


a.  At  8:05  a.m.  on  Saturday,  October 8,  the  eve  of  the  2nd  presidential debate,  Donald  Trump  will  enter  through  the  right  door  the  studio of  Good  Morning America  with  George Stephanopoulos  and  Robin  Roberts  of  ABC,  the  network  of  the  anchor of  that  debate, Martha  Raddatz,  and  before  the  cameras  of  the  national and  international  media  and  the  eyes  of  scores  of  millions  of  viewers  he  will  be  holding  a  copy  of  his  tax  returns  with  a  flash  drive  on  top  containing their  digital  version in  a  not-passworded  pdf  file,  none  bearing  any  redactions.


b.  If  Sec.  Clinton  enters through  the  left  door  holding a  copy  of  her  30,000 deleted  emails  with  a  flash  drive  on  top  containing their  digital  version in  a  not-passworded  pdf  file,  none  bearing  any  redactions,  both  candidates  will  walk  to,  and  release them  on,  a  table  behind which  there  will  be  five  people,  the  document  receivers, who  indisputably  enjoy  their  trust:


1) Martha  Raddatz, anchor  of  the  second  presidential debate;


2) the  moderator of  the  second presidential  debate,  Anderson Cooper  of  CNN; 


3) the  moderator of  the  third  presidential  debate, Chris  Wallace  of  Fox  News;  and 


4) the  chairs of  the  Commission on  Presidential  Debates (CPD),  Mr.  Frank  J.  Fahrenkopf, Jr.,  and  Mr.  Michael  D.  McCurry. 


c.  If  after  checking  the  paper  and  digital  versions of  those  documents at  least  three  of  these  five  document receivers  agree  that  Mr.  Trump  and  Sec.  Clinton  have  produced  what  they  are  supposed  to,  the  receivers will  use  the  flash  drives to  make  those  documents  available on  the  websites of  ABC,  CNN,  Fox,  CPD,  and  the  websites  of  the  national and  international  media  represented  at  that  event. There  will  be  some  36  hours  for  the  media, the  viewers,  and  the  rest  of  the  world  to  analyze  the  documents  before the  debate  the  next  day.


d.  If  one  candidate  fails  to  show  up  and  produce  the  expected  documents to  the  receivers, the  other  will  not  be  required  to  produce  his  or  hers,  but  may  do  so  voluntarily.  Obviously, if  with  the  cameras  of  the  world  trained  on  a  door  the  corresponding candidate  fails  to  enter  through it  with  the  documents  in  hand,  he  or  she  will  suffer a  credibility-devastating  blow.  One  candidate stared  at  the  other  while  calling  the  other’s  bluff, and  the  other  blinked  and  crawled  away.


On  this  occasion,  you,  Mr.  Trump, can:


a.  denounce unaccountable  judges,  some  confirmed  by  Then-Sen.  Clinton, who  risklessly  engage for  their  convenience and  gain  in  wrongdoing(jur:5§3ol:154¶3)  that  deprives  parties and  the  rest  of  the  public  of  their  property, liberty,  and  rights, and  intercept  their  communications  to  protect  themselves, which  can  set  off  a  scandal;  outrage the  public  of  all  stripes; and  rally  it behind  Trump  as  the  only  Establishment  Ousider who  can  go  to  Washington and  disrupt  the  corrupt  and  corruptive  system of  connivance  between judges  and  the  politicians  who  recommend,  endorse, nominate,  confirm,  and  then  fear  judges  and  their  power  to  retaliate by  declaring  a  party’s  legislative agenda  unconstitutional;


b.  call  for  a  Watergate-like  generalized media  investigation  of  the  two  unique  national stories  of  P.  Obama-Justice  Sotomayor and  Federal  Judiciary-NSA  (infra); 


c.  demand nationally  televised  hearings on  judges’  wrongdoing; 


d.  cause  the  resignation of  judges,  whose  vacancies  you  will  get  to  fill;  and 


e.  attract the  attention  of  more  than  100  million people  who  are  parties  to  more  than  50  million cases  filed  annually in  the  federal and  state  courts(jur:8fn4,5),  or  parties  to  scores  of  millions  of  cases,  and  who  are  at  the  mercy  of  unaccountable  wrongdoing judges;  they  constitute a  huge  untapped voting  bloc  of  people  dissatisfied with  the  judicial and  legal  systems, and  form  part  of  the  largest  segment of  the  public and  the  electorate: The  Dissatisfied  With  The  Establishment.


I[1]  respectfully  request a  meeting  with  you  and  your  officers to  present  this  and  other  proposals[2].
_______________________________


[1.]  This  letter(>ol2:481)  together  with  previous  ones(cf. >ol2:463)  and  supporting materials,  all  of  which  contain more  proposals  appropriate for  preparing  for  the  second presidential  debate,  are collected  in  the file  at:



Those  letter  and materials  are  based on,  and  also  found  in,  my  study  of  judges and  their  judiciaries, which  is  titled and  downloadable  thus:


Exposing  Judges’ Unaccountability  and 
Consequent  Riskless  Wrongdoing: 
Pioneering  the  news  and  publishing  field  of 
judicial  unaccountability  reporting


The  study  runs  to  more  than  965  pages  and  is  contained  in  two  volumes:






Visit  the  website  at,  and  subscribe to  its  series of  articles  thus:
www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org >+ New  or Users  >Add  New


Dare  trigger  history!(*>jur:7§5)…and  you  may enter  it.

*******************************


A.  The  P.  Obama-J.  Sotomayor story  and  the  Follow the  money!  investigation


What  did  the  President(*>jur:77§A),  Sen.  Schumer  &  Gillibrand(jur:78§6),  and  federal judges(jur:105fn213b)  know  about  the  concealment of  assets  by  his  first  Supreme  Court  nominee,  Then-Judge, Now-Justice  Sotomayor  –suspected  by  The  New  York  TimesThe  Washington Post,  and  Politico(jur:65fn107a)  of  concealing assets,  which  entails the  crimes(ol:5fn10)  of  tax  evasion(jur:65fn107c)  and  money  laundering  but  covered up  and  lied(ol:64§C)  about  to  the  public  by  vouching  for  her  honesty because  he  wanted to  ingratiate  himself with  those  petitioning him  to  nominate another  woman  and  the  first  Hispanic  to  replace  Retiring Justice  Souter  and  from  whom  he  expected in  exchange  support for  the  passage of  the  Obamacare bill  in  Congress; and  when  did  they  know  it  and  other  wrongdoing?(ol:154¶3)



This  story  can  be  pursued through  the  Follow  the  money!  investigation(jur:102§aol:1,  66),  which  includes a  call  on  the  President to  release  unredacted all  FBI  vetting reports  on  J.  Sotomayor and  on  her  to  request that  she  ask  him  to  release  them.  That  can  set  a  precedent  for  vetting  judges and  other  candidates for  office;  and  open  the  door  for  ‘packing’ the  Federal  Judiciary after  judges  resign for  ‘appearance  of  impropriety’. 




To  what  extent  do  federal  judges abuse  their  vast  computer  network and  expertise  –which  handle hundreds  of  millions of  case  files(Lsch:11¶9b.ii)–  either  alone  or  with  the  quid  pro  quo  assistance of  the  NSA  up  to  100%  of  whose  secret requests  for  secret surveillance  orders  are  rubberstamped(ol:5fn7)  by  the  federal  judges of  the  secret court  established  under  Foreign  Intelligence Surveillance  Act–  to: 


1) conceal  assets  crime  under  26  U.S.C.  §§7201, 7206(ol:5fn10),  unlike surveillance–  by  electronically  transferring them  between  declared and  hidden  accounts(ol:1);  and


2) cover  up  their  interception of  the  communications  –also  a  crime  under  18  U.S.C.  §2511(ol:20¶¶11-12)–  of  critics of  judges  to  prevent  them  from  joining  forces to  expose  the  judges?,  which  constitutes  a  contents-based  interception, thus  a  deprivation of  1st  Amendment rights,  that  would  provoke  a  graver  scandal than  Edward  Snowden’s revelation  of  the  NSA’s  illegal dragnet  collection  of  only  contents-free metadata  of  scores of  millions  of  communications.


See  the  statistical analysis(ol:19§Dfn2)  of  a  large  number of  communications  critical of  judges  and  a  pattern of  oddities(ol2:395405425),  pointing to  probable  cause  to  believe that  they  were  intercepted. 

This  story  can  be  pursued  through the  Follow  it  wirelessly!  investigation(jur:105§b;  ol:269§C).


Dr.  Cordero  respectfully requests  an  opportunity to  present  to  Mr.  Trump  and  his  officers  the  proposed  investigation by  the  media(ol:194§E)  and law  school  professors and  students(ol2:452)  of  these  two  unique national  stories  of  judges’  wrongdoing.


Dare  trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)…and  you  may  enter  it.
******************************






Sharon4Judge