TALK ABOUT A QUID PRO QUO re City St. Paul,MN DIRTY DEALS
USSC 10-1032 TITLED MAGNER VS. GALLAGHER.
STRANGE; MNAG at this time Lori Swanson or MIKE Hatch
never involved???
Lillhaug should have resolved Sharons Realestate at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN AT that time. Tenants in Common Sharons Parents were never served, altho Dad ie Wm O Peterson friends with Judge Otis Godfrey could have saved
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
EYES ARE TIRED CAN;T FIND RECENT LILLHAUG ORDER TO SUSPEND LAWYERS.
Upcoming Supreme Court Livestreams
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
Sharons Homesteads.
Sharons trusttrilogy
Sharon4JudgeSharons trusttrilogy
AFFIANT Mrs. Sharon Peterson aka1sthusband Scarrella,2nd Anderson
herein after Sharon is not a Liar except for Age similar to Tina Turner, and not a Lawyer, Thank God President Donald Trump- is not a Lawyer.
SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
PEREZ AND LILLHAUG MANULIPATING USSC10-1032 TITLED
MAGNER VS GALLAGHER
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
There is much more to the story of how Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulated the rule of law and pushed the limits of justice to make this deal happen. In his fervor to protect disparate impact, Perez attempted to cover up the true reasons behind the Justice Department’s decision to decline Fredrick Newell’s case by asking career attorneys to obfuscate the presence of Magner as a factor in the declination decision and by refraining from a written agreement. In his zeal to get the City to agree, Perez offered to provide HUD’s assistance to the City in moving to dismiss Newell’s whistleblower complaint. The facts surrounding this quid pro quo show that Perez may have exceeded the scope of the ethics and professional responsibility opinions he received from the Department and thereby violated his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the United States. Perez also misled senior Justice Department officials about the quid pro quo when he misinformed then-Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli about the reasons for Magner’s withdrawal. The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and tthe reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
HOWEVER; The Heinous, Downfall of Our Country are the Lying Obama Lawyers DFL TOM PEREZ ,
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
| Assumed office February 25, 2017 | |
| Deputy | Keith Ellison (2017–2018) None (2018–present) |
|---|---|
David Lee Lillehaug (born May 22, 1954)[1] is an Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. He served as the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota from 1994 to 1998.David LLillehaug was appointed by Governor Mark Daytonon March 26, 2013 to serve as an illehaug - Wikipedia
In a message dated 11/27/2019 2:07:27 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
Sharons-GrandJury2007 COUNT VIII
Choi's refusal to submit to Grand Jury or State AG Keith Ellison
suspect. THEREFORE;
Affiant Candidate Whistleblower Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Hometown,Homegrown, Love of St. PAUL, Loyal Trump supporter
in her Humble Way, mandates Grand Jury investigations into the
Conduct,Fundraising,DFL Endorsements,in a NonPartisan Race.
xx
