Thursday, March 13, 2008

Chief Justice Russell Anderson Retires to circumvent Electorate

Minnesota's chief justice to retire (61%)
03/09/2008 - Chief Justice Russell Anderson of the Minnesota Supreme Court today notified Gov. Tim Pawlenty that he will retire June 1. similar results
By Bill Salisbury bsalisbury@pioneerpres
Minnesota's chief justice to retire
By Bill Salisbury
bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com

Chief Justice Russell Anderson of the Minnesota Supreme Court today notified Gov. Tim Pawlenty that he will retire June 1.

Initially appointed to the Supreme Court in 1998, he has been chief justice since 2006. He previously served as a district court judge.

"Chief Justice Anderson is an extraordinary leader and public servant," Pawlenty said in a statement. "From his service in the United States Navy to his leadership of the Minnesota Supreme Court, he has committed his life to protecting and upholding our state and nation's values and principles. We especially thank him for his 25 years of hard work and dedication as a judge and wish him well in his retirement and future endeavors."

Sharon Scarrella Anderson
AOL
#10
19 min ago
Shameful circumvention of Election Process by Russell Anderson, former 9th Dist. Judge, who covertly caused the "Murder" of http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com "takings" of Sharon's Propertys Buck Lake,GunLake, Crow Wing-Gull Lake, The Public has a right to know of any/all complaints
taxaction without representation
JOHN H. KROGSTAD
xxxxxx, Apt. 3
Burlington, MA 01803-5451
Telephone:(781)
john.krogstad@rcn.com
November 2, 2007
Mr. David S. Paull, Executive Secretary
Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards
2025 Centre Pointe Boulevard, Suite 420
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Re: Ethics Complaint against Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson
Dear Mr. Paull:
I wish to file an ethics complaint against Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson for willful failure to exercise adequate oversight of Lawyers Professional Responsibility to ensure that they are conducting investigations of ethics complaints against all Minnesota lawyers with due diligence, specifically including county attorneys. I have filed many complaints against Dakota County Attorney James C. Backstrom with Lawyers Professional Responsibility for unethically perpetrating frauds upon the courts of two states and the federal government, which they summarily dismissed without investigation and Chief Justice Anderson refused to review. I believe the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards is entitled to an independent review of Chief Justice AndersonĂ¢€™s failure to act in this case.
When five Massachusetts judges refuse to enforce a Minnesota judgment while they are legally required to enforce all valid out-of-state judgments, and Dakota County Attorney Backstrom then fails to protest or appeal the Massachusetts judges refusal to enforce his judgment and dismissal of my case in its entirety, there is probable cause to ask why. When DCA Backstrom refuses to enforce his own judgment in a Minnesota court of law for fifteen years and only then to garnish my social security benefit for another thirty years instead of simply initiating a bench warrant for my arrest and extradition to Minnesota for immediate and full enforcement of his judgment in a Minnesota court of law, there is probable cause to question the validity and legality of the judgment. Obviously, none of this is in the best interest of his client. I believe a county attorney acting in the best interest of his client would enforce his own judgment in something less than half a century. Thank you.
Sincerely,
/signed/
John H. Krogstad http://johnkrogstad.blogspot.com also http://sharon4judge.blogspot.com
Sharon Scarrella Anderson
AOL
#11
14 min ago
URL Correction http://john-krogstad.blogspot.com FURTHER google Justice Russell Anderson MN see what come up
Submitted under penality of perjury, denials of "due process" and in Good Faith to educate the Public at Large http://sharon4council.blogspot.com n

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Judges Get Off the Bench MN Russell Anderson

Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Denys Due Process, particularly up North MN. Aitkin, Buck Lake, triggering the "Murder" of http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/
"taking" of Real Estate Sharon&JR HomelessBlogBrief
TAKING DL_AOL Journal by Senile Judge Larry Cohen

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON AND BILL DAHN CURRENT CANDIDATES FOR MN HOUSE 64A & 65B WITH STANDING CLAIMS ,INJURED PARTYS,VICTIMS OF DENIAL DUE PROCESS'S

WE IMHouse judiciary panel files civil lawsuit to enforce Miers, Bolten subpoenas
[JURIST] The US House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF; press release] Monday to enforce subpoenas seeking information from former White House legal counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten [official profiles] regarding the US Attorneys firing scandal [JURIST news archive]. Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said Monday:It is extremely ... [
more].PLORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY TO CONVENE GRAND JURY RE:
PELOSI LETTER TO MCKASY

HEREBY GIVE TESTIMONY VIA ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TO OBJECT TO ELECTION O JUDGES
QUESTION: 1) What if anything does this example teach us about
the nature of the problem we are facing in trying to bring about judicial
accountability and the forces in opposition to us in this regard?

New Episode of Get Off The Bench at
www.getyourjusticelive.com Wednesday March 12, 2008!
SEAPARATION OF POWERS LAWYER LEGISLATORS- JUDGING LAWYER JUDGES: with LAWYER MAYOR,GOVERNOR,ATTORNEY GENERAL
MANDATES TAXACTION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION TO LAWYER SENATOR MEE MOU

2008 at 8:00pm Eastern, with an even larger number of National Board Directors from the United Civil Rights Councils of America available to answer your questions.

Minnesota Senate - Committee Hearings and Actions for S.F. 3129

Senate Information
Committee Hearings and Actions for S.F. 3129
DateCommittee Hearing or Action
Committee on Judiciary
03/13/2008Meeting scheduled for 06:00 PM in Room 15 Capitol
03/13/2008

FURTHER ELECTRONIC TESTIMONY thurs.13Mar08 to be held at 6pm at rm 15 State Capitol by information and belief "tying" from HF121 to



Minnesota State Legislature -- Bill Search, Status, and MyBills

Minnesota Senate
BodyDateActionDescription / CommitteePageRoll Call
Senate 02/25/2008 Introduction and first reading 6700
Senate 02/25/2008 Referred to Judiciary


Minnesota Senate
Senate Authors Latz; Moua


Short Description Judges mandatory retirement age increase


Long Description
Committee Hearings and Actions Senate Counsel & Research Summary


BodyDateActionDescription / CommitteePageRoll Call
Senate 03/12/2007 Introduction and first reading 852
Senate 03/12/2007 Referred to Judiciary
Senate 02/25/2008 Author added Moua 6678


BodyStatusBill
Text
SummaryLong
Description
Chief
Author
Short Description
SenateSF0833TextSummaryDescriptionOlson, M.Minnesota Wireless Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Anti Trust tying - Google Search

Anti Trust tying - Google Search Revisor of Statutes Michele Timmons, Revisor

IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AS A LAWYER, FORMER RISK MANAGER,Ramsey County
Phone: (651) 296-2868 TTY: 1-800-627-3529 Fax: (651) 296-0569
Email:
revisor@revisor.leg.state.mn.us 700 State Office Building
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.55105
Michele Timmons, lawyer, risk management MN - Google Search

Revisor of Statutes. Michele Timmons, Revisor Phone: (651) 296-2868 TTY: 1-800-627-3529 Fax: (651) 296-0569 Email: revisor@revisor.leg.state.mn.us ...
www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/ - 16k - Cached - Similar pagesRevisor MN Michele Timmons - Google Search
MEMORANDUMN OF US CONGRESS
JURIST - Paper Chase: House judiciary panel files civil lawsuit to enforce Miers, Bolten subpoenas


Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)




H.RES.979
Title: Recommending that the House of Representatives find Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten, Chief of Staff, White House, in contempt of Congress for refusal to comply with subpoenas duly issued by the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor:
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] (introduced 2/13/2008) Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills:
H.RES.982
Latest Major Action: 2/14/2008 Passed/agreed to in House. Status: Pursuant to the provisions of
H. Res. 982, H. Res. 979 is considered passed House.
Note: Related Committee Report: H. Rept.
110-423.


All Information (except text)Text of Legislation CRS Summary Major Congressional Actions

All Congressional Actions

All Congressional Actions with Amendments
With links to Congressional Record pages, votes,reports
Titles Cosponsors (None) Committees
Related Bills Amendments Related Committee Documents
CBO Cost Estimates Subjects






Click here: Bill Number Search- Minnesota House of Representatives HF1261 Status in House for Legislative Session 85

Bill Name: HF1261
Bill Text

Wed. 12Mar08 hereby give notice by e-commerce to testify electronically at the public hearing

City Council MeetingMarch 12, 2008 - 03:30 PM Agenda

today concerning St. Paul city Council Agenda: City Attorneys unionized with extreme salary increases, while covertly undermining the tax base by giving Loans/Grants interest Free, without paybacks.

Companion: SF2079
Bill Text
Bill Status
Senate Search

MEMORANDUM OF ELECTION The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times : Judiciary Proposes $475 Million Budget Increase for '09 LAW-Licensedlawyerjudges
Revisor Number: 07-2118
Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351 (1997)
MICHELE L. TIMMONS, ACTING DIRECTOR, RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY ..... Minnesota law further requires that "[a]n affidavit of candidacy shall state ...
FURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME SUBMITTED IN GOOD FAITH
Sharon with Standing In re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2nd562
http://sharon4judge.blogspot.com/
and Bill Dahn
http://www.billdahn.blogspot.com/ http://www.billdahn.com/
Submitted in Good Faith
Candidate Profile FCC Complaints LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews,
press releases, Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money Laundering andknowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidsecurities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, Image:WritPro06 26.pdf - Wikimedia Commons before acting
Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/
SHARON-MN-ECF: Judges-Greylord-Libby-Guilty LUFSKY Scap129FAnokaP2697(1976) Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , TAKING DL_AOL Journal Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: 1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson


Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Judicialn Candidates-Free Speech

Lawsuit says rules for judicial candidates violate free speech (56%)
03/04/2008 - MINNEAPOLIS—A Golden Valley attorney is challenging Minnesota's rules for judicial candidates—again. Greg Wersal has filed a federal similar results
Lawsuit says rules for judicial candidates violate free speech
The Associated Press


MINNEAPOLIS—A Golden Valley attorney is challenging Minnesota's rules for judicial candidates—again.

Greg Wersal has filed a federal lawsuit claiming that the rules violate his free speech rights. It's a general argument Wersal has won before.

The standards were revised two years ago, but Wersal is challenging them on a couple of fronts. He says it's unfair that candidates can't endorse other candidates for other offices. He also says it's unfair that judicial candidates can't solicit contributions except under certain conditions.

David Paull, the executive secretary for the Board on Judicial Standards, said he hadn't seen the lawsuit and couldn't immediately comment.posts 1 - 1 of 1

Sharon Scarrella Anderson
AOL
#1
1 hr ago
Go Wersal In re: Scarrella for Associate Justice221NW2nd562 "Published" without royalitys to this Affiant, Non Lawyer contrary to Constitutional Guarantees, Election Process, http://sharon4judge.blogspot.com Sharon is Candidate http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com from her Legal Residence
Apr 21st its 20 yrs that the corrupt courts have "taken" without Just compensation
http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com
We NON LAWYERS are not 2nd Class Ciizens

Monday, March 3, 2008

Whistleblower Davis_Corrupt Courts

Please help promote this video from Minnesota www.lesliedavis.org HF1261
In a message dated 3/3/2008 12:01:00 P.M. Central Standard Time, ebobie@hughes.net writes:
HF1261 MN - Google Search

In my research I found the following:
"Graduate of the department of the University of Louisiana were required to obtain a license from the supreme court before they were entitled to practice as attorneys at law in any court of the state. R.S. 1870 &112 did not make their diploma the equivalent of a license, and they were liable under sec. 756 to the clerk of the supreme court for his fee of $10, for a certificate of admission. An order of the supreme court, however, admitting one to practice in all the courts of the state, was equivalent to the required license. In re Villere, 1881, 33 La.




__._,_.___

Big Brother v. City St.Paul MN

Big Brother /really IS/ watching you: AT&T whistleblower, Mark
> Klein tells all about it
>
> converted into a tiny URL:
> *
http://tinyurl.com/2yu6f3* <http://tinyurl.com/2yu6f3>* *(An
> advertisement will play at the front. Give it time)

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Judicial Atrocities-Separation of Powers

SEPARATION OF POWERS

LAWYERS IN ALL BRANCH'S WE ARE 2ND CLASS CITIZENS TO

PAY FOR THE JUDICIAL BRANCH, MN CONST. ART. III

This Blogger 1994 Republican N0minee for MN State Attorney General , against Tom Neaville who was just appointed to Judgeshiphttp://www.sharon4anderson.org/ and at www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates

has been victimized by Lawyer Governors: Lawyer Judges to the Murder of http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/ , Disparagement from the 9th Judicial District as property owners http://sharon4council.blogspot.com/

"In case you didn't know Al Quie might have a vested interest in changing the Minnesota Consititution on behalf of his bad Judicial appointees.

In the 2006 Election, Former Justice Terrance Holter was removed from office, by the voters, in Beltrami County
and for good cause. In other words, the present system does have a good check and balance built into it, it's called the voters. Former Gov. Al Quie is the governor that appointed Former Justice Holter. Holter was cited for having secret meetings on cases that he was hearing without both parties, to the cases, being present. Chief Judge Lois Lang first cited Former Justice Holter for having a secret meeting
dealing with a criminal case. In that case the secret meeting was held between Chief Public Defender Kristine Kolar and a member of Beltrami County Prosecutor Timothy Faver's office, and Former Justice Holter. By the way, Kristine Kolar was not
the defendant's attorney. In other words, the 3 held a secret meeting without the defense being present. Their actions were observed and the defense attorney brought complaint which caused Former Judge Holter to be cited for violation of Minnesota Cannon.

In the same time frame, Former Justice Holter held another ex parte meeting, against a Native American woman, and wrongfully took her custody of her child and ordered the
child to be placed in the care of her husband that had just been found guilty of domestic abuse. It was only a couple of months before that ex parte hearing that former Justice Holter gave custody to the mother due to the dangerous actions of the father. Prosecutor Faver then had the woman arrested and charged her with a felony of denying of parental rights, when she was not even informed or aware of the secret meeting between her husband and the Judge. Faver then prosecuted the woman and her defense
lawyer was again Kristine Kolar who instructed her to plead guilty to a crime Kolar knew the Native American woman did not commit. The Native American woman refused to plead guilty. Former Justice Holter then found the Native American woman guilty as charged. Thus, the 6 year old
girl was forceably removed from her mother and handed to the convicted domestic abuser. Bill Lawrence covered the issue in his paper which brought the whole issue out into the open. When this issue got into the news, suddenly Former Justice Holter reversed himself, and demanded the child be returned, but it was too late, as the child was already in the hands of the convicted domestic abuser, who
took the child to Red Lake Resevation and refused to return her. To find this story all you have to do is google on "Jawnie Hough" the name of the mother.
During the last campaign, in a Chamber of Commerce forum to meet the candidates, the Bemidji Pioneer quoted (see below) Former Justice Holter of responding to a question by a voter as to whether or not he had ever been cited for violating judicial cannon, where he falsely responded
that he had not, but then went on to say that they had
exparte meetings all the time, and that ex parte meetings were needed.
However, Minnesota Judicail Cannon expressly prohibits ex parte meetings.

Now, if the voters had had their constitutional rights taken from then to remove a judge via the election process, as Al Quie suggests, Former Justice Holter would likely still be enrobed, moving ahead with his ex parte and secret meetings, in violation to the U.S. and Minnesota
Constitutional due process protections. The February following the elections, Former Justice Holter then charged the winner with violating state campaign rules, however, the
administrative Judge hearing the case dismissed Former Judge Holter's complaint.

It may also be interesting to you to know that Governor Pawlenty's Judicial selection committee had chosen Kristine Kolar as one of the 3 prime candidates for being appointed as a 9th District Court Judicial Judge in Beltrami County, after and regardless of her being involved in the secret meeting in the crimianl case. So you can see the electorate
cannot trust the Judicial selection committee's recommendations to police judical selection. Neither
could a Judicial Board, selected by the Governor, work on rating Judicial officers.

Exerpt from Bemidji Pioneer October 28, 2006, entitled: "Holter discusses role of Judge at forum"

"In an audience question, Holter was asked if he ever held an "exparte" conversation with an attorney or had been admonished by the district's chief judge for doing so, suggesting it is a violation of judicial cannons for a judge to discuss a case with an attorney without the attorney for the
other side being present. Holter said he's technically held "ex parte" discussions, but has never been cited for violation Judicial cannons. Such discussions are necessary, as long as they don't cross a line, he said. 'I have never had that complaint made,' he said. 'We do ex parte all the time'"

If any thing, should the Minnesota Constitution need to be changed, it needs to be changed to remove the Governor from doing any appointing of Judicial officers, and all Judical officers need to be elected by the people they serve."

Minnesota Courts-Fire the Judge's

Click here: TwinCities.com - Minnesota Courts / Fire the judge? Voters could decide#recent_comm





Minnesota Courts / Fire the judge? Voters could decide
New group endorses 'retention elections'
BY BILL SALISBURY
Pioneer Press

Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Alan Page said "this nation would go crazy" if the referees officiating the Super Bowl on Sunday "had an interest in the outcome."

The former Minnesota Viking and member of the NFL Hall of Fame said Thursday he hopes Minnesotans would be equally outraged if judges who had an interest in the outcome decided court cases.

But that's exactly what could happen if the state doesn't overhaul the way it selects judges, he said.

That's why Page, former Gov. Al Quie and other leaders announced at a Capitol news conference the formation of an advocacy group, Minnesotans for Impartial Courts, to support a state constitutional amendment that would create "retention elections" for judges. The organization will wage a lobbying and education campaign to put the proposed constitutional amendment on the Nov. 4 ballot.

In retention elections, voters decide whether to fire or keep sitting judges. Under current state law, judges can be unseated in an election only if someone comes forward and challenges them, which rarely happens.

Quie, the chairman of the group, said the change is needed to protect the fairness and impartiality of the state's judicial system.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 struck down Minnesota's restrictive rules governing judicial campaigns, so now candidates for judgeships are free to raise and spend unlimited sums of money, seek partisan endorsements and tell voters where they stand on issues. Quie said that opens

the door to high-stakes political campaigns for judges with negative advertising and special-interest group endorsements and money.

"You can't have an impartial judiciary if that is the case," said Quie, who last year chaired the Citizens Commission for the Preservation of an Impartial Judiciary that recommended retention elections.

The proposed amendment, sponsored by Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope, and Rep. Steve Simon, DFL-St. Louis Park, has these four key features:

-- A merit selection commission would nominate the most qualified candidates to fill all judicial vacancies.

-- The governor would appoint judges from a list provided by the commission.

-- A performance evaluation commission would be created to assess judges' performance and release its findings to the public.

-- Sitting judges would stand for retention elections every eight years. Voters would vote yes or no on the judge. No challengers would be on the ballot. If voters removed a judge from the bench, the governor would appoint a replacement.

First elected to the high court in 1992, Page is the only justice in recent history who was not first appointed by a governor.

Bill Salisbury can be reached at bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com or 651-228-5538.


Sharon4Judge