DefeatLeftestJudges_VoteSharon4Seniors_MN4Mitt_Marriage

Subj: Defeat Leftist Judges

 

Dear Fellow Patriot, Please see the following important newsletter from the Committee for an Ethical Judiciary and help them out. Many judges are up for election or re-election on Tuesday and that will have a dramatic impact on the future of our country. Sincerely, Joe Miller

Committee for an Ethical Judiciary David Shrum - Chairman The Committee for an Ethical Judiciary 932 "D" Street, Suite 2 Ramona, California 92065

Dear Conservative Friend,

Leftist judges are on the ballot all across America. And the Committee for an Ethical Judiciary is working overtime to defeat them next Tuesday.

Unfortunately, we are being massively outspent by liberal special interest groups that are determined to seize or expand their control over state courts, and to impose their leftist, socialist, views on America. Please make an urgent donation of $25, $50, $100, $250, or whatever that you can afford to help fund conservative l This is profoundly urgent. The leftists have specifically targeted a number of states, and even specific state supreme court seats this year.

They are spending huge amounts of time and money to win these elections. And the Committee for an Ethical Judiciary is the only conservative group in America that is 100% committed to helping win these critical judicial elections. Many of the candidates that we are supporting don't have very high name ID, or much organization. And many of the conservative challengers to liberal, anti-traditional values, and pro-ObamaCare judges don't have much money. That's why the conservative grassroots needs to stand up. In North Carolina, the liberals are fighting like crazy to seize control of that state's Supreme Court. They want to use the court to attack traditional marriage and voter ID laws. In Alabama, former judge and conservative hero Roy Moore is campaigning to win a seat on the Alabama State Supreme court. This is one of the most brutal judicial campaigns in the country. Alabama and America need Roy Moore back on the bench. In Florida, left-wing members of that state's Supreme Court - Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis, and Peggy Quince, - are all running for reelection. These three liberals have led the charge in support of ObamaCare. We have a GREAT chance to finally get rid of these anti-Constitution judicial activists! And, in Iowa, ultra-liberal Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins is fighting to remain on the bench. He was one of the justices who forced Iowa to legalize homosexual marriage. If we get Iowa conservatives to turn out, we can defeat this crusading leftist! In the months and years to come, the fate of traditional marriage, voter ID laws, immigration control measures, and scores of other conservative issues will be decided by state supreme courts. That makes this year's elections so incredibly important. And, because many of these elections are "non-partisan," and involve "social issues", the Republican Party establishment wants nothing to do with them! So the Committee for an Ethical Judiciary has to step in and help.

Please, conservative judicial candidates need your help! If the candidates and challenge efforts that we are supporting get blown out because they didn't get the kind of grassroots support that their left-wing opponents receive, America will pay a horrific price.

Our goal is to help identify and turn out conservative voters in these key races. And our ability to do that could mean the difference between winning and losing. Please do what you can. Election Day is next week! Thank you in advance for your generosity. If the link does not work, you can copy and paste the following full link in your browser window: https://grassroots.cc/13290_121102_CEJPAC_RS_JM_Defeat_Leftist_Judges Sincerely,

David Shrum - Chairman Committee for an Ethical Judiciary 932 "D" Street, Suite 2 Ramona, California 92065

Please forward this vital message to all of your friends & acquaintances.

Minnesota Sharon4Seniors must RICO Judges Gregg Johnson and Jon Vandenorth.
 

                                        NEWS RELEASE 3RDNOV.2012

                               http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA120622-1031.pdf

Sent: 11/3/2012 11:16:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: CandidateSharon4SeniorsMN64_Constitutionality204c.31County_State Canvass Boards                   Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer Unreasonable 20 yrs later Tobacco Case Still in Court  THEREFORE DFL Lawyer,Commitment Lawyer Senator64 Dick Cohen MN CONST.ARTIII MUST GO:

TThe Supreme Court concluded (1) the proposed tobacco appropriation bonds did not constitute public debt for which the state's full faith, credit, and taxing powers have been pledged under the plain language of Minn. Const. art. XI, 4; and (2) therefore, the restrictions imposed by Minn. Const. art. XI, 5 do not apply to the bondsSearch Results

1. MPR: Minnesota's Tobacco Trial: A Summary

   news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/.../08_stawickie_histo...Cached - SimilarShare

   Shared on Google+. View the post.

   You +1'd this publicly. Undo

   May 8, 1998 – At its heart, Minnesota's tobacco case was a fraud and anti-trust case. The state and Blue Cross and Blue Shield claimed tobacco companies Schowalter v. State

Docket: A12-622 Judge: Per Curiam Areas of Law: Constitutional Law Petitioner, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget, validation tobacco appropriation bonds to be issued to refund, in advance of maturity, outstanding tobacco securit

Opinion Date: October 31, 20 http://j.st/X92 View Case on: Justia  Google Scholar 12

 

SAT: 3NOV2012

Please Vote Tues 6thNov2012 Forward,circulate,copy Vote YES Sharon4Seniors

Minnesota4Mitt4Marriage

 

   Subject: Candidate SharonAndersonABOLISH SCAPCommittment PanelJudgesBadBehaviorRICO Wilful neglience to AbateSeeking Assistance  also www.lawlessamerica.com NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH INTENT TO CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF COUNTY AND STATE CANVASS BOARD MEMBERS, DEFENDANTS MARK OSWALD, SHARI MOORE CITY CLERK,JUDGE KAREN J. ASPHAUG MEMBER OF SCAP ET AL. MN CONSTITUTION ART. III SEPARATION OF POWERS. Ruling Case Law In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562  www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com  www.lufsky.blogspot.com 

 

ThereforeSharon4AG2014

1.    Ramsey   County canvassing board:            Rafael Ortega, Ramsey County Commissioner

                                                                                Jan Parker, Ramsey County Commissioner

                                                                                Mark Oswald, Ramsey County Auditor

                                                                                Lawrence Dease, Ramsey County Court Administrator

                                                                 Shari Moore, St Paul City Clerk – designee of Mayor Coleman

ST. PAUL, Minn.—October 30, 2012—Secretary of State Mark Ritchie today announced the members of the State Canvassing Board whose responsibility it will be to canvass and certify the results of the State General Election held on November 6.

Minnesota Statutes 204C.31 requires the Secretary of State to select the five members of state canvassing board. By law members of the board must be the secretary of state, two judges from the Minnesota Supreme Court and two judges of the district court.

Members of the 2012 State General Election State Canvassing Board include:
• The Honorable Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Secretary of State
• The Honorable Paul H. Anderson, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Christopher J. Dietzen, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Edward I. Lynch,  Chief Judge, First Judicial District
• The Honorable Karen J. Asphaug, District Court Judge, First Judicial District

To avoid conflicts of interest, by law, no judges or justices who are members of the state canvassing board may be candidates at the election.  It is also important to note that unlike other election issues subject to administrative recounts, constitutional amendments are not subject to recounts administered by the state canvassing board, but are subject to court election contests.

The State Canvassing Board will meet at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, in Room 10 of the State Office Building located at 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota

http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ must file July 2013

                                  Thurs.11Oct.2012   VOTE YOUR PRINCIPLES_PASSIONS_PERSONS  NOV6TH,2012

 

     To the Above Named:  Hon. DFL Mark Dayton,DFL Lori Swanson, Chief Justice Lori Gildea, her opponent Dan Griffin, et al,Candidates, Media, Editors of all Newspapers, MN&USA. Please Assist Judicial Complicity.

Sharon VA Widow, has put her Life on the Line, When Public Officials are Notified of High Crimes and Misdemeanor , re: Oath of Office, the Police Power must enforce, with Grand Jury Proceedings.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/obstructing_justice_statutes.html

 

JUDGES  OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PRACTING LAW VIA FALSE,BOGUS,UNPUBLISHED ORDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513

Title 18 U.S.C. § 111

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1961

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986

Years of blowback consequences from criminal acts protecting high-level corruption

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=484.06

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf

 

                                       CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON'S  www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com  state and alleges that the Forensic Evidence of                 COUNT I MS609.903  RICO

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT_CHAP_SEC&year=2006&section=609.903

Subdivision 1. Crime. A person is guilty of racketeering if the person:
(1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise and intentionally conducts or participates
in the affairs of the enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity;
(2) acquires or maintains an interest in or control of an enterprise, or an interest in real
property, by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or
(3) participates in a pattern of criminal activity and knowingly invests any proceeds derived
from that conduct, or any proceeds derived from the investment or use of those proceeds, in an
enterprise or in real property.

 

Judges using their Official Capacity in thir Licensed Franchise are Guilty of Rackerteering in Minnesota, Forensic Files www.sharon4anderson.org   www.taxthemax.blogspot.com  www.crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com DISCLAIMER: HON. BILL WINDSOR www.lawlessamerica.com

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=522:federal-courts-do-not-issue-valid-orders-check-the-orders-in-your-case&catid=121:articles&Itemid=222

Sunday, 06 November 2011 11:38

William M. Windsor

One of the many ways that federal judges routinely violate the law is by issuing "orders" that appear to be court orders, but they are merely invalid pieces of paper.
 28 U.S.C. § 1691 requires that all orders must be signed and issued under seal.
In my experience, federal courts rarely issue legal orders....
The word “process” at 28 U.S.C. § 1691 means a court order.  See Middleton Paper Co. v. Rock River Paper Co., 19 F. 252 (C.C. W.D. Wisconsin 1884);  Taylor v. U.S., 45 F. 531 (C.C. E.D. Tennessee 1891);  U.S. v. Murphy, 82 F. 893 (DCUS Delaware 1897);  Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510 (C.C. W.D. Virginia 1904);  U.S. v. Sharrock, 276 F. 30 (DCUS Montana 1921);  In re Simon, 297 F. 942, 34 ALR 1404 (2nd Cir. 1924);  Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1968);  and Miles v. Gussin, 104 B.R. 553 (Bankruptcy D.C. 1989).

Contract with the Citizens of the United States

 We are asking all elected and appointed government officials and all political candidates to sign an HONESTY Contract with the Citizens of the United States of America. 

 Download a copy of the Contract here.

We ask all Americans to vote only for candidates who have signed the Contract.

The Supreme Court Justices:

• Chief Justice Lorie Skjerven Gildea       
•     Dan Griffin  www.griffithforjudge.com
• Justice Alan C. Page
• Justice Paul H. Anderson
• Justice G. Barry Anderson       Dean Barkley www.barkleyforjustice.com
• Justice Christopher J. Dietzen
• Justice David R. Stras         Tim Tingelstad www.highesthill.com
• Justice Wilhelmina M. Wright

 

                                             Thurs. 11 Oct.2012

To the Above Named: Candidate Sharon Anderson Senate 64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com  Pristine_Passion
to Abolish the SCAP Judges merits State and Federal  hearings. 

 

   Apparantly Chief Justice Lori Gildea www.mncourts.gov has failed or refused to reappoint these Judge.s May 23rd 2011 Last Appointment. techinally Abolishing the SCAP Panel chaired for years by Lesbian Judge Joanne Smith. www.lufsky.blogspot.com

 

    Candidate Anderson  on the Grave of her 2nd Husband Cpl.James R. Anderson who was Murdered 21Sept.2000 right after his Release from Brainard State Hospital for 1 year, dueto PTSD. Taking our Homestead 1988 by Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin et al. http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/panelorder.html  http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf

 

 

    Then and Therefore QUESTIONS:  Has the Chief Justice Lori Gildea techinally Abolished the State Commitment Panel aka SCAP chaired by Lesbian Judge Joanne Smith,Kathleen Gearin ,Judge Gregg Johnson ,his Wife Susan Haigh complicit with DFL Senator Dick Cohen and all others. http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/coa/current/opa101270r-100912.pdf   http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearin

 

    Further: if any Commitments in the Last 7 month must be vacated as the SCAP Panel has no Authority or Jurisdiction. And or has SCAP been Abolished?

 

 

A10-1270
            In re Civil Commitment of:  Robert Archie Kunshier.
            Affirmed.  Judge Kevin G. Ross.
            Dakota County District Court, Hon. Patrice K. Sutherland.

	Judge - 2nd District Court 6
		www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com  Judicial Corruption www.lawlessamerica.com

	Judge - 2nd District Court 6
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
		JOHN B. (JACK) VANDENORTH	Nonpartisan	http://judgejackvandenorth.posterous.com	5/22/2012

http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/ Vandenorth complicit with Ramsey Co. Attry Jean Stephan embellezed tax payments complicity with Mark Oswald, his agents,assigns,Laura Manning et al.
	Judge - 2nd District Court 12
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
		GREGG E. JOHNSON	Nonpartisan		5/22/2012

CONSPIRACY TO COMMITT MURDER VIA BOGUS ORDERS OF COMMITTMENTS

EXPLOITING SILVER STAR MARINE PTSD HEALTH http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/801-2007-02-27T034341Z/DM-1399_23.p,,

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf

State Senator District 64
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
		SHARON ANDERSON	Republican	www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com	5/23/2012
		DICK COHEN	Democratic-Farmer-Labor		5/22/2012
					6/1/2012
		SCOTT LARSON	Independent	http://larson4mnsenate64.com	6/5/2012

	Chief Justice - Supreme Court
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
					6/5/2012
		LORIE SKJERVEN GILDEA	Nonpartisan	www.chiefjusticeloriegildea.com	5/22/2012
		DAN GRIFFITH	Nonpartisan	griffithforjudge.com	5/31/2012
	Associate Justice - Supreme Court 1
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
		BARRY ANDERSON	Nonpartisan	justicebarryanderson.com	5/22/2012
		DEAN BARKLEY	Nonpartisan	www.barkleyforjustice.com	5/29/2012
	Associate Justice - Supreme Court 4
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
					6/5/2012
		DAVID R. STRAS	Nonpartisan	justicestras.org	5/22/2012
		TIM TINGELSTAD	Nonpartisan	highesthill.com	6/5/2012

                           A12-0622        James D. Schowalter, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota
                      Department of Management and Budget, Petitioner, vs. The State of
                      Minnesota and the Taxpayers and Citizens of the State of Minnesota,
                      Respondents.
                      Supreme Court.
            1.   The constitutionality of the Appropriation Refunding Bonds sought to be issued by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget presents a justiciable controversy.
            2.   The Appropriation Refunding Bonds sought to be issued by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget do not constitute public debt for which the State’s full faith, credit, and taxing powers have been pledged under Article XI, Section 4 of the Minnesota Constitution.
            Constitutional question answered.  Per Curiam.
            Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Justice Paul H. Anderson.
            Dissenting, Justice Alan C. Page.
            Took no part, Justice Wilhelmina Wright.

 

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ


Current Candidate _Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.sharon4anderson.org
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012

Sent to sharon4anderson@aol.com — why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences JoeMiller.US · PO Box 83440 · Fairbanks, Alaska 99708