Saturday, September 26, 2020
MichelleMacDonaldPeoplesJustice3Nov2020byGretaKAULMNPost
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Thursday, December 26, 2019
NoWayJudgeMichaelDavisdismissRICOcaseDenyingJuryTrials
| Minnesota District Court | |
| Judge: | Michael J Davis |
| Referred: | Steven E Rau |
| Case #: | 0:04-cv-02632 |
| Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Cause | 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | May 05, 2004 |
| Re-opened: | Nov 30, 2010 |
| Terminated: | Jul 18, 2017 |
| Docket last updated: 12 hours ago |
| Wednesday, July 19, 2017 | ||
| 360 |  order Judgment (Clerk's Office Only) Wed 07/19 2:29 PM JUDGMENT(las) | |
| Att: 1 Civil Notice - appeal | ||
| Tuesday, July 18, 2017 | ||
| 359 | order Order Dismissing Case Wed 07/19 9:02 AM ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/17. (KMW) | |
| Wednesday, July 12, 2017 | ||
| 358 | notice Notice (Other) Wed 07/12 3:54 PM NOTICE by St Paul, City of Non-Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Kappelman, Ben) | |
| 357 | motion Dismiss/General Wed 07/12 1:21 PM MOTION to Dismiss/General UNOPPOSED filed by Kelly G Brisson, Mark E Meysembourg, Frank J Steinhauser, III.(Shoemaker, John) | |
| Att: 1 Certificate of Service via ECF | ||
Thursday, November 28, 2019
Happy Thanksgiving President Trump
THANKSGIVING DAY THURS28NOV2019
AFFIANT Mrs. Sharon Peterson aka1sthusband Scarrella,2nd Anderson
David Lee Lillehaug (born May 22, 1954)[1] is an Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. He served as the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota from 1994 to 1998.
David LLillehaug was appointed by Governor Mark Daytonon March 26, 2013 to serve as an illehaug - Wikipedia
Sharons-GrandJury2007 COUNT VIII
TALK ABOUT A QUID PRO QUO re City St. Paul,MN DIRTY DEALS
USSC 10-1032 TITLED MAGNER VS. GALLAGHER.
STRANGE; MNAG at this time Lori Swanson or MIKE Hatch
never involved???
Lillhaug should have resolved Sharons Realestate at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN AT that time. Tenants in Common Sharons Parents were never served, altho Dad ie Wm O Peterson friends with Judge Otis Godfrey could have saved
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
EYES ARE TIRED CAN;T FIND RECENT LILLHAUG ORDER TO SUSPEND LAWYERS.
Upcoming Supreme Court Livestreams
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
Sharons Homesteads.
Sharons trusttrilogy
Sharon4JudgeSharons trusttrilogy
AFFIANT Mrs. Sharon Peterson aka1sthusband Scarrella,2nd Anderson
herein after Sharon is not a Liar except for Age similar to Tina Turner, and not a Lawyer, Thank God President Donald Trump- is not a Lawyer.
SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
PEREZ AND LILLHAUG MANULIPATING USSC10-1032 TITLED
MAGNER VS GALLAGHER
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
There is much more to the story of how Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulated the rule of law and pushed the limits of justice to make this deal happen. In his fervor to protect disparate impact, Perez attempted to cover up the true reasons behind the Justice Department’s decision to decline Fredrick Newell’s case by asking career attorneys to obfuscate the presence of Magner as a factor in the declination decision and by refraining from a written agreement. In his zeal to get the City to agree, Perez offered to provide HUD’s assistance to the City in moving to dismiss Newell’s whistleblower complaint. The facts surrounding this quid pro quo show that Perez may have exceeded the scope of the ethics and professional responsibility opinions he received from the Department and thereby violated his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the United States. Perez also misled senior Justice Department officials about the quid pro quo when he misinformed then-Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli about the reasons for Magner’s withdrawal. The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and tthe reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
HOWEVER; The Heinous, Downfall of Our Country are the Lying Obama Lawyers DFL TOM PEREZ ,
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
| Assumed office February 25, 2017 | |
| Deputy | Keith Ellison (2017–2018) None (2018–present) |
|---|---|
David Lee Lillehaug (born May 22, 1954)[1] is an Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. He served as the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota from 1994 to 1998.David LLillehaug was appointed by Governor Mark Daytonon March 26, 2013 to serve as an illehaug - Wikipedia
In a message dated 11/27/2019 2:07:27 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
Sharons-GrandJury2007 COUNT VIII
Choi's refusal to submit to Grand Jury or State AG Keith Ellison
suspect. THEREFORE;
Affiant Candidate Whistleblower Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Hometown,Homegrown, Love of St. PAUL, Loyal Trump supporter
in her Humble Way, mandates Grand Jury investigations into the
Conduct,Fundraising,DFL Endorsements,in a NonPartisan Race.
xx
SharonsForensicFilesvsLawyers,Judges,License,DFL,TomPerez,DavidLillhaug
WED27NOV2019
THANKFUL I CAN STILL SEE OUT OF R EYE
ON THE GRAVES OF HERITAGE, WILL CONTINUE TO
FIGHT CITY HALL, RE THE DAYS OF LOU MCKENNA
mon at 
Sharons Legal Homestead 1058 Summit Ave.
TO THE ABOVE NAMED Going 4 Broke if all Government Officials refuse to Answer or Abate Criminal Activitys Then What is a Person to do
In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007 Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12 th ,2007 public hearing Aug.15 th ,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053
THANKSGIVING DAY THURS28NOV2019
TALK ABOUT A QUID PRO QUO re City St. Paul,MN DIRTY DEALS
USSC 10-1032 TITLED MAGNER VS. GALLAGHER.
STRANGE; MNAG at this time Lori Swanson or MIKE Hatch
never involved???
Lillhaug should have resolved Sharons Realestate at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN AT that time. Tenants in Common Sharons Parents were never served, altho Dad ie Wm O Peterson friends with Judge Otis Godfrey could have saved
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt
EYES ARE TIRED CAN;T FIND RECENT LILLHAUG ORDER TO SUSPEND LAWYERS.
Upcoming Supreme Court Livestreams
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
12/02/2019 9 a.m.- AIM Development v. City of Sartell, 10 a.m.- State v. Thompson
Sharons Homesteads.
Sharons trusttrilogy
Sharon4JudgeSharons trusttrilogy
AFFIANT Mrs. Sharon Peterson aka1sthusband Scarrella,2nd Anderson
herein after Sharon is not a Liar except for Age similar to Tina Turner, and not a Lawyer, Thank God President Donald Trump- is not a Lawyer.
SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
PEREZ AND LILLHAUG MANULIPATING USSC10-1032 TITLED
MAGNER VS GALLAGHER
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
There is much more to the story of how Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulated the rule of law and pushed the limits of justice to make this deal happen. In his fervor to protect disparate impact, Perez attempted to cover up the true reasons behind the Justice Department’s decision to decline Fredrick Newell’s case by asking career attorneys to obfuscate the presence of Magner as a factor in the declination decision and by refraining from a written agreement. In his zeal to get the City to agree, Perez offered to provide HUD’s assistance to the City in moving to dismiss Newell’s whistleblower complaint. The facts surrounding this quid pro quo show that Perez may have exceeded the scope of the ethics and professional responsibility opinions he received from the Department and thereby violated his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the United States. Perez also misled senior Justice Department officials about the quid pro quo when he misinformed then-Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli about the reasons for Magner’s withdrawal. The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and tthe reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watcho
We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
HOWEVER; The Heinous, Downfall of Our Country are the Lying Obama Lawyers DFL TOM PEREZ ,
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
Tom Perez - Wikipedia
| Assumed office February 25, 2017 | |
| Deputy | Keith Ellison (2017–2018) None (2018–present) |
|---|---|
David Lee Lillehaug (born May 22, 1954)[1] is an Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. He served as the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota from 1994 to 1998.David LLillehaug was appointed by Governor Mark Daytonon March 26, 2013 to serve as an illehaug - Wikipedia
In a message dated 11/27/2019 2:07:27 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
Sharon’s discovery of Treason by city officials in all realestate matters: Forcing repeal of State and Federal Laws. Cooking the Fidicuary Books by Mail Fraud , Extortion, Complicity, Theft of Personal Property,defrauding the State of Minnesota and the United States of America, http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com by mail fraud, confusion,stacking,blatant trespass on private property in a “Patterned Enterprise” for Greed, to conspire to commit Murder by WATER SHUTOFF www.sharonanderson.org. FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A SUIT FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER AUTHORITY OF ARTICLE I, SECTIONS 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 & 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JUDICIAL NOTICE re: MS2.724 of City and County Attorneys, Lawyer Mayors Treasonable Bad
The information which led to the discovery of the conspiracy and its nature and extent was largely obtained by intercepting messages on the telephones of the conspirators by four federal prohibition officers. Small [277 U.S. 438, 457] wires were inserted along the ordinary telephone wires from the residences of four of
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates; SHARONS Blogs mainly fighti
tng Real Estate ISSUES and City St. Paul,MN 2006
TO 2019
COUNT I Deceptive Trade AntiTrust
Fri.15Nov2019
STATE FEDERAL QUESTIONS
Has the City St. Paul and county of Ramsey indulged in Elder Abuse via Illegal Consent Agenda's Illegal Fees with 4.5 $ interest to Steal Private Propertys for Pecuniary Gain, over decades currently Senior Sharons Blindness Trump Supporter, RICO Patterned to have Excessive INSPECTIONS without Valid Complaints to exploit any all Seniors Homeowners
QUESTIONS MS 609.43
1. Has/Have City Government by Bogus DSI Inspectors created Charter Violations, without decending to particulars, in violations of Canons of Construction.
9-39.000 - Contempt Of Court | JM | Department of Justice
9-39.000 - Contempt Of Court | JM | Department of Justice
2. Is the City St. Paul,MN IN Contempt of City Charter
Is City St.Paul in Contempt of City Charter - Google Search
Is City St.Paul in Contempt of City Charter - Google Search
3, Has Candidate VA Widow,White,Whistleblower Mrs. Sharon Scarrella Anderson for Decades IN her realestate been reduced to poverty, currently the Bizzare of City Billing Sharon $157.oo monthly at 4.5 interest compounded daily. since 2007
Sharon4CouncilWard2: St.Paul Guilty FTC Consumer Fraud
Sharon4CouncilWard2: St.Paul Guilty FTC Consumer Fraud
i. Magner by info and belief still employeed in City St. Paul,MN, BUT FOR lives and pays taxes in Stillwater.
ii. MUST be reopened for Damages
magner v. gallagher - Google Search
magner v. gallagher - Google Search
Defamed by the DFL Paryt along with USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher.
COUNT III Taxaction without Representatio
0n
0n
MKt v 57.500 RAISED 2020 to 75,700
Total Tax excluding special assessments Percent of Tax Change $629.72 $868.00 37.8%
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
Illegal Assessments re Consent Agenda;s Sharon
Code-Corruption COUNT IV CODE CORRUPTION
Sun.17Nov2019
To John Choi Ramsey Co Attorney et al
Affiant in Good Faith, Public Policy must expose the Ponzi Taxing Schemes of City St. Paul and Ramsey County.
Barr defends Trump's use of executive authority, slams impeachment hearings | TheHill
Barr defends Trump's use of executive authority, slams impeachment hearings | TheHill
Scrool to Count III RulingCases
Pettiford603 Edmond st.Paul,MN case https://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com/
Anderson surrey https://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/
Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $1,424.21 over and above of 2019
taxes paid.on mk tvalueof 57thous.
Sicko-City StPaul Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Betty Speaker Kidney Dyalis, Roger Stadler
COUNT V 5thAmend Takings without Just Compensations
Sicko-City StPaul Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Betty Speaker Kidney Dyalis, Roger Stadler
Disabled S
enior,W Pettiford
enior,W Pettiford
| RLH OA 19-9 | 2 | 12 | repurchase application, 603 Edmund Avenue | Resolution LH Other Appeal Type | Making recommendation to Ramsey County on the application of Wesley Eugene Pettiford for Repurchase of Tax Forfeited Property at 603 EDMUND AVENUE. |
Sun10Nov2019
Affiant with Standing going after the Law License of City Council Rachael Tierney,Ineffective Assistance of Council for City,Counsel apparantly 4 past 20 years, to date the Trash/Garbarge Seniro, Chris Tolbert Violations of MN Constitution Art. III Separation of Powers and Art.X Taxaction Equity, Tolbert should Resign from Hennepin Co. Attorneys Office or from St. Paul City Council, Let Patty Hartman take the Office.
COUNT VII Takingsby Theft by Swindle without Just Compensations
Sharons Home at 448 Desnoyer taken by Judge Faricy without Just Compensation
Sharons Homestead at 1058 Summit Also taken by Lesbian Judges Joanne Smith,Kathleen Gearin without Just Compensations, All Propertys Flipped
6 unit 325 N.Wilder,Duplex 2194 Marshall, Then Sharon and 2nd Husband both Disabled moved to a Tar Paper Shack on Buck Lake.
Sharons-GrandJury2007 COUNT VIII
Choi's refusal to submit to Grand Jury or State AG Keith Ellison
suspect. THEREFORE;
Affiant Candidate Whistleblower Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Hometown,Homegrown, Love of St. PAUL, Loyal Trump supporter
in her Humble Way, mandates Grand Jury investigations into the
Conduct,Fundraising,DFL Endorsements,in a NonPartisan Race.
Public
COUNT X 100 BLOGS,SITES,RICO COMPLAINTS CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES UNABATED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
XX
Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 2006 1976
Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 2006 1976
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
