SharonsSlideShare

SharonsFacebook

www.facebook.com

Sharon's Favorites

Loading...

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Misconduct Judge Timothy L. Blakely_MN Greylord

MN is getting as Bad as Chicago Judges re: GreylordMN Greylord - Google Search Greylord Judge corruption - Google Search
What ever happened to Judge Venne and Lawyer Doug Kelley?Judge Venne and Lawyer Doug Kelley MN - Google Search
Judge Timothy L. Blakely (

Misconduct? Judge referred people to a lawyer he owed money


Judge Timothy Blakely said he was eager to see difficult divorces settled out of court. So, he assigned case after case to a St. Paul mediator Blakely swore he could trust. There were two problems:

  • The attorney was his own.
  • He owed her six figures.

    The Goodhue County district judge stands accused of funneling 19 divorce cases to the law firm that handled his divorce in exchange for a steep reduction in his legal debt. He appeared Monday before a judicial fact-finding panel to fight allegations of misconduct.

    The "quid pro quo" arrangement allegedly helped him slice two-thirds — nearly $64,000 — off a legal bill of $108,000 left over from his divorce, according to attorneys for the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards, which filed a complaint against him in August.

    In a November 2005 e-mail to attorney Christine Stroemer, Blakely said he was saddled with debts from his failed marriage and the six children he and his fiancee were raising together. He offered Stroemer the "lump sum" proceeds from the sale of his home as a compromise.

    His e-mail to Stroemer reads:

    "(My fiancee) and I are in a serious bind. ... A sizeable lump sum now may be preferable to very long-term payments. There is also very substantial past, and future, benefit to you from significant business referrals we have made."

    Doug Kelley, an attorney for the Board on Judicial Standards, said the judge later offered to include Stroemer in a database of trusted civil mncourts.gov)

  • correct?"

    Blakely responded: "I do. And I know right from wrong."

    The judge's former wife, Judith Blakely, alerted the Board on Judicial Standards to his alleged arrangement with Stroemer in April 2007.

    In letters and e-mails to Stroemer, Blakely said his ex-wife had declared bankruptcy, complicating his finances.

    Blakely, who has served as a judge in the First Judicial District since 1998, is chambered in Goodhue County and hears court cases throughout the seven-county district, including Dakota, Carver and Scott counties.

    Legal proceedings could continue into Wednesday. Attorneys for Blakely have said the Hennepin County attorney's office has reviewed the allegations and declined to press charges.

    Peppering the judge with questions, Kelley spent the morning walking Blakely through a chronology of his divorce, his mounting debts and the letters, phone calls and e-mails between Blakely and Stroemer.

    In an Oct. 1, 2007, letter to the board, Blakely said he did not believe the number of cases he assigned to Stroemer's firm increased after his divorce. For mediation, the firm had always been a popular option among judges in the district, the judge said.

    In the letter, he went on to regret some of the "stark" language in his e-mails to Stroemer and said his mention of "significant business referrals" in November 2005 was meant to describe the kind of referrals he made "regularly with friends and others who know that I am a judge (and) ask for the name of a lawyer who I think would do a good job for them."

    Blakely told Stroemer in a February 2006 e-mail that he had a possible offer on his house that would produce a net proceed of $30,000 or $31,000. He hoped that would settle his bill.

    "Wow, you are asking me to forego (sic) over $60,000 in earned fees," Stroemer e-mailed back, reluctantly accepting the compromise. "Nonetheless, it is my hope we continue a good relationship and that you continue to refer cases to me."

    Kelley told Blakely: "Judge, did it not make you uncomfortable that in the discussion of the compromise, right in the middle of the e-mail, she's discussing the referrals?"

    Said Blakely: "No. ... I remember getting this e-mail and thinking, thank God, it will be over."

    Frederick Melo can be reached at 651-228-2172.


    Monday, November 17, 2008

    ELECT NONLAWYER JUDGES MINN. 221NW2nd 562 Scarrella Assoc. Justice

    EeKeep our Courts Fair
    Keep Our Courts Fair ELECT NON LAWYER JUDGES

    The time to act is now. Minnesota can take am immediate step to prevent the politicization of judicial elections. Merit selection, performance evaluation and retention elections will keep our judicial system focused on making fair and impartial decisions.

    This session, help us encourage the Legislature to submit a constitutional amendment to Minnesota voters to change the process for selecting and retaining judges. This will increase the accountability of our judicial system while protecting its impartiality, as well as respecting the rights of citizens to make the final retention decision. The time to act is now.


    Take Action

    Message Recipients

    Your State Senator(s)

    Your State Representative(s)

    Review the Message

    A sample letter appears below, but a message written in your own words will be the most effective.









    Thank for contacting your legislator on the impartial courts project. Your voice has helped put pressure on legislators to safeguard our historically fair and impartial courts from special interest influence by creating a "merit selection" and "retention election process."

    Your message was sent to:

    Senator Richard J. Cohen
    Representative Erin Murphy

    Judicial elections across the country are experiencing expensive partisan campaigns even in so called nonpartisan states like Minnesota. As a result of a recent Supreme Court case, Minnesota's historically fair and impartial courts could soon be up for sale because of large sums of special interest money in judicial campaigns.

    We can prevent this from happening in our state - now is the time to preserve the judicial impartiality Minnesotans expect from their judges. I urge you to support a constitutional amendment to change the process for selecting and retaining judges, increasing the accountability of our judicial system while protecting its impartiality and the rights of citizens to make the final retention decision informed by unbiased evaluation of each judges performance.
    PS Voting Rights Act does not require Lawyers License to be in the Elective Employment of Judge, In re Scarrella for Assoc.Justice 221NW2nd562, Illegally published without Royalitys http://sharon4judge.blogspot.com ELECT NONLAWYERS MN. CONST ART. III, alternative All Lawyers resign from the Executive/Legislative Branchs http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com

    Sincerely, In the Interest of Justic
    Sharon Scarrella Anderson
    1058 Summit Ave
    PO Box 4384
    St. Paul, MN 55105-3003

    Tuesday, November 11, 2008

    Eric Magnuson MS2.724,Veterans Day MN Election Challenge


    To your husband JimAnderson http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/ &To my step dad Jim Cunningham

    11Nov08 Tues. Veterans Day
    SEPARATION OF POWERS ,BERG V. OBAMA US SUPREME COURT 08-570
    BERG v. OBAMA et al :: Justia News
    ONE MAN ONE VOTE, BILL DAHN AND SHARON ANDERSON'S VOTES NOT COUNTED?
    MEDIA CENSURSHIP
    DISCLAIMER: BILL NATIVE AMERICAN,SHARON SOVERIGN CITIZEN, BOTH MN HOMEGROWN,NOT LIARS OR LAWYERS
    RACE IS NOT THE ISSUE BUT OBAMA AND BIDEN BOTH LAWYERS IS.
    MUST NOT TALK DOWN TO THE NON LAWYER VOTERS

    To: MN Chief Justice Judge Profile Eric Magnuson et al US,MN,Governor,
    Attorney General, All County, Municipalities, All Agencies by and thro the State Legislature.
    MS2.724 in2.724, 2008 Minnesota Statutes official capacity,individually, State Canvass Board Member, with the undersigned Affidavit Of Prejudice

    in re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562 Illegally Published without Royaltys for Sharon
    http://sharon4judge.blogspot.com/ EM clerked for Justice Sheran, Lawyer Bias,
    a. Challenge of all Judicial Races, Affidavit of Canddacy Unconstitutional requiring Lawyers licence for Judgship,co.attorneys,sheriffs, et al usurpers of Voting Rights Acts.

    1. Pursuant to Veterans Day and to Honor our Veterans, 4 Our Country First
    2. Notice of Obama's Birth Challenge in the US Supreme Court File No.
    Sharon4StateRep64A: Berg Writ v. Obama Crimes 11-07-08 Cell (610) 662-3005 U.S. Supreme Court No. 08 - 570 Potential for Federal Election Challenges.News results for Norm Coleman Election US Senator
    Google Search Bin Laden Planning 'Bigger' 9/11 Attacks
    Fugitive terrorist Osama bin Laden is planning new attacks against the U.S. that will "outdo by far" the attacks of 9/11, according to a report in a London-based Arabic newspaper.
    Read the Full Story —
    Go Here NowSpecial: 6 Days of Hell: the Coming War with Iran
    3. National Security at Risk Separation of Powers - Google Search






    Eric J. Magnuson became Minnesota’s 21st Chief Justice on June 2, 2008., Magnuson was an attorney and shareholder at the Briggs and Morgan Law Firm in Minneapolis, practicing almost exclusively in state and federal appellate courts, and working in consultation with trial attorneys on matters in anticipation of appeal. Previously, he was an attorney and partner with the Rider Bennett law firm in Minneapolis from 1977



    JOIN NATION-WIDE PROTEST MARCH “STOP OBAMA NOW” « Afrhttp://africanpress.wordpress.com/join-nation-wide-protest-march-stop-obama-now/ Map of Kenya - Map Zone




    /s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
    Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act
    MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw

    NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers



    Sharon4Judge