Thursday, October 6, 2016

Monday, October 3, 2016

Dr.RichardCorderoDonaldTrump4USPresidentJudicialDisciplineReform

NOTEIf  in spite  of  all the  effort  to circumvent  the  ‘glitch’ in  word  processing or  emailing  software that  creates  “joinedwords”in my emails(>ol2:426§C),  this  email has  them,  kindly overlook  them  and  let  me  know  at  Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net  and  CorderoRic@yahoo.com



Proposal  for  production by 
Donald  Trump  of  his  tax  returns
and
Sec.  Clinton  of her  30,000  deleted emails
on  ABC Good  Morning  America
at  8:05 a.m.  on  Saturday, October  8;
and  for  denouncing unaccountable  judges’  riskless wrongdoing;
launching  the  media  investigation  of 
the  two unique  national  stories of
President  Obama-Justice  Sotomayor concealment of assets and 
Federal  Judiciary-NSA  interception of  emails;  and
calling  for  nationally televised  hearings  on  judges’  wrongdoing



By

Dr.  Richard Cordero,  Esq.
Ph.D., University  of  Cambridge, England
M.B.A.,  University  of Michigan  Business  School
D.E.A.,  La  Sorbonne, Paris

Judicial  Discipline Reform
New York  City 

Visit  the  website  at,  and  subscribe to  its  series of  articles  and  letters  thus:
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org >+New  or  Users >Add  New

Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, 
CorderoRic
@yahoo.comDrCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, 
Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net



If  you  believe that  judges’  are  held  unaccountable and  risklessly dispense with dueprocess and equal protection  of  the  law for  their  convenience and  gain,  depriving  you,  your  family,  friends, and  the  rest  of  us  in  our  country  of  our  property, liberty,  and  the  rights  and  duties  that  shape  our  lives,  forward this  email  to  both  candidates.

Copy  and  paste  in  the  To:  line  of  your  forwarding  email  this bloc  of  email  addresses:


This is  your  opportunity to  denounce  judges’  unaccountability  and  riskless wrongdoing.  Take  action!  Share, post,  and  republish this  email  in its  entirety  as widely  as  possible and  become  a producer  of  an event  that  can change  the  campaign and  decide  the election.



Mr.  Donald  J.  Trump
Donald  J.  Trump  for  President, Inc.
725  Fifth  Avenue
New  York,  NY  10022


Dear  Mr.  Trump,

In your  first  presidential debate,  you  challenged Sec.  Clinton  to  produce  her  30,000  deleted emails  in  exchange for  your  production of  your  tax  returns.  While  she  did  not  take  up  your  challenge,  she  did  not  turn  it  down  either. 

This opens  the  opportunity for  you  to  raise  the  stakes  by  making  a  national  announcement on  tweets,  emails, at  rallies,  and  through  Gov.  Pence  at  his  vice  presidential  debate that  will  build  up  enormous expectation  and  focus  the  attention on  you: 


a.  At  8:05  a.m.  on  Saturday,  October 8,  the  eve  of  the  2nd  presidential debate,  Donald  Trump  will  enter  through  the  right  door  the  studio of  Good  Morning America  with  George Stephanopoulos  and  Robin  Roberts  of  ABC,  the  network  of  the  anchor of  that  debate, Martha  Raddatz,  and  before  the  cameras  of  the  national and  international  media  and  the  eyes  of  scores  of  millions  of  viewers  he  will  be  holding  a  copy  of  his  tax  returns  with  a  flash  drive  on  top  containing their  digital  version in  a  not-passworded  pdf  file,  none  bearing  any  redactions.


b.  If  Sec.  Clinton  enters through  the  left  door  holding a  copy  of  her  30,000 deleted  emails  with  a  flash  drive  on  top  containing their  digital  version in  a  not-passworded  pdf  file,  none  bearing  any  redactions,  both  candidates  will  walk  to,  and  release them  on,  a  table  behind which  there  will  be  five  people,  the  document  receivers, who  indisputably  enjoy  their  trust:


1) Martha  Raddatz, anchor  of  the  second  presidential debate;


2) the  moderator of  the  second presidential  debate,  Anderson Cooper  of  CNN; 


3) the  moderator of  the  third  presidential  debate, Chris  Wallace  of  Fox  News;  and 


4) the  chairs of  the  Commission on  Presidential  Debates (CPD),  Mr.  Frank  J.  Fahrenkopf, Jr.,  and  Mr.  Michael  D.  McCurry. 


c.  If  after  checking  the  paper  and  digital  versions of  those  documents at  least  three  of  these  five  document receivers  agree  that  Mr.  Trump  and  Sec.  Clinton  have  produced  what  they  are  supposed  to,  the  receivers will  use  the  flash  drives to  make  those  documents  available on  the  websites of  ABC,  CNN,  Fox,  CPD,  and  the  websites  of  the  national and  international  media  represented  at  that  event. There  will  be  some  36  hours  for  the  media, the  viewers,  and  the  rest  of  the  world  to  analyze  the  documents  before the  debate  the  next  day.


d.  If  one  candidate  fails  to  show  up  and  produce  the  expected  documents to  the  receivers, the  other  will  not  be  required  to  produce  his  or  hers,  but  may  do  so  voluntarily.  Obviously, if  with  the  cameras  of  the  world  trained  on  a  door  the  corresponding candidate  fails  to  enter  through it  with  the  documents  in  hand,  he  or  she  will  suffer a  credibility-devastating  blow.  One  candidate stared  at  the  other  while  calling  the  other’s  bluff, and  the  other  blinked  and  crawled  away.


On  this  occasion,  you,  Mr.  Trump, can:


a.  denounce unaccountable  judges,  some  confirmed  by  Then-Sen.  Clinton, who  risklessly  engage for  their  convenience and  gain  in  wrongdoing(jur:5§3ol:154¶3)  that  deprives  parties and  the  rest  of  the  public  of  their  property, liberty,  and  rights, and  intercept  their  communications  to  protect  themselves, which  can  set  off  a  scandal;  outrage the  public  of  all  stripes; and  rally  it behind  Trump  as  the  only  Establishment  Ousider who  can  go  to  Washington and  disrupt  the  corrupt  and  corruptive  system of  connivance  between judges  and  the  politicians  who  recommend,  endorse, nominate,  confirm,  and  then  fear  judges  and  their  power  to  retaliate by  declaring  a  party’s  legislative agenda  unconstitutional;


b.  call  for  a  Watergate-like  generalized media  investigation  of  the  two  unique  national stories  of  P.  Obama-Justice  Sotomayor and  Federal  Judiciary-NSA  (infra); 


c.  demand nationally  televised  hearings on  judges’  wrongdoing; 


d.  cause  the  resignation of  judges,  whose  vacancies  you  will  get  to  fill;  and 


e.  attract the  attention  of  more  than  100  million people  who  are  parties  to  more  than  50  million cases  filed  annually in  the  federal and  state  courts(jur:8fn4,5),  or  parties  to  scores  of  millions  of  cases,  and  who  are  at  the  mercy  of  unaccountable  wrongdoing judges;  they  constitute a  huge  untapped voting  bloc  of  people  dissatisfied with  the  judicial and  legal  systems, and  form  part  of  the  largest  segment of  the  public and  the  electorate: The  Dissatisfied  With  The  Establishment.


I[1]  respectfully  request a  meeting  with  you  and  your  officers to  present  this  and  other  proposals[2].
_______________________________


[1.]  This  letter(>ol2:481)  together  with  previous  ones(cf. >ol2:463)  and  supporting materials,  all  of  which  contain more  proposals  appropriate for  preparing  for  the  second presidential  debate,  are collected  in  the file  at:



Those  letter  and materials  are  based on,  and  also  found  in,  my  study  of  judges and  their  judiciaries, which  is  titled and  downloadable  thus:


Exposing  Judges’ Unaccountability  and 
Consequent  Riskless  Wrongdoing: 
Pioneering  the  news  and  publishing  field  of 
judicial  unaccountability  reporting


The  study  runs  to  more  than  965  pages  and  is  contained  in  two  volumes:






Visit  the  website  at,  and  subscribe to  its  series of  articles  thus:
www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org >+ New  or Users  >Add  New


Dare  trigger  history!(*>jur:7§5)…and  you  may enter  it.

*******************************


A.  The  P.  Obama-J.  Sotomayor story  and  the  Follow the  money!  investigation


What  did  the  President(*>jur:77§A),  Sen.  Schumer  &  Gillibrand(jur:78§6),  and  federal judges(jur:105fn213b)  know  about  the  concealment of  assets  by  his  first  Supreme  Court  nominee,  Then-Judge, Now-Justice  Sotomayor  –suspected  by  The  New  York  TimesThe  Washington Post,  and  Politico(jur:65fn107a)  of  concealing assets,  which  entails the  crimes(ol:5fn10)  of  tax  evasion(jur:65fn107c)  and  money  laundering  but  covered up  and  lied(ol:64§C)  about  to  the  public  by  vouching  for  her  honesty because  he  wanted to  ingratiate  himself with  those  petitioning him  to  nominate another  woman  and  the  first  Hispanic  to  replace  Retiring Justice  Souter  and  from  whom  he  expected in  exchange  support for  the  passage of  the  Obamacare bill  in  Congress; and  when  did  they  know  it  and  other  wrongdoing?(ol:154¶3)



This  story  can  be  pursued through  the  Follow  the  money!  investigation(jur:102§aol:1,  66),  which  includes a  call  on  the  President to  release  unredacted all  FBI  vetting reports  on  J.  Sotomayor and  on  her  to  request that  she  ask  him  to  release  them.  That  can  set  a  precedent  for  vetting  judges and  other  candidates for  office;  and  open  the  door  for  ‘packing’ the  Federal  Judiciary after  judges  resign for  ‘appearance  of  impropriety’. 




To  what  extent  do  federal  judges abuse  their  vast  computer  network and  expertise  –which  handle hundreds  of  millions of  case  files(Lsch:11¶9b.ii)–  either  alone  or  with  the  quid  pro  quo  assistance of  the  NSA  up  to  100%  of  whose  secret requests  for  secret surveillance  orders  are  rubberstamped(ol:5fn7)  by  the  federal  judges of  the  secret court  established  under  Foreign  Intelligence Surveillance  Act–  to: 


1) conceal  assets  crime  under  26  U.S.C.  §§7201, 7206(ol:5fn10),  unlike surveillance–  by  electronically  transferring them  between  declared and  hidden  accounts(ol:1);  and


2) cover  up  their  interception of  the  communications  –also  a  crime  under  18  U.S.C.  §2511(ol:20¶¶11-12)–  of  critics of  judges  to  prevent  them  from  joining  forces to  expose  the  judges?,  which  constitutes  a  contents-based  interception, thus  a  deprivation of  1st  Amendment rights,  that  would  provoke  a  graver  scandal than  Edward  Snowden’s revelation  of  the  NSA’s  illegal dragnet  collection  of  only  contents-free metadata  of  scores of  millions  of  communications.


See  the  statistical analysis(ol:19§Dfn2)  of  a  large  number of  communications  critical of  judges  and  a  pattern of  oddities(ol2:395405425),  pointing to  probable  cause  to  believe that  they  were  intercepted. 

This  story  can  be  pursued  through the  Follow  it  wirelessly!  investigation(jur:105§b;  ol:269§C).


Dr.  Cordero  respectfully requests  an  opportunity to  present  to  Mr.  Trump  and  his  officers  the  proposed  investigation by  the  media(ol:194§E)  and law  school  professors and  students(ol2:452)  of  these  two  unique national  stories  of  judges’  wrongdoing.


Dare  trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)…and  you  may  enter  it.
******************************






Friday, July 1, 2016

SharonSenate64exposingStateCommitmentPanel4BadBehavior

                                      DISCLAIMER

ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON



             Look to the R for membership uploaded www.scribd.com/sharon-anderson-1091

Here’s the order, Sharon.
June 29, 2016
                             Thanks Kyle JUNE 30TH2016
         Affiant Current Candidate for State Senate 64 vs. Dick Cohen DFL, Commitment lawyer, Independent Contractor.
                   www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com
                  Re Minn. Constitution Art. III Separation of Powers
                         20 YEARS OF JUDICIAL MALPRACTICE
                             SECRET COURTS MUST BE ABATED.
                        FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME
EXCEPT REPUBLICAN WIDOW SHARON L. ANDERSON IS A DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTED.
                                                      Art.X Taxaction
                          NEWS RELEASE
                       PLEASE NOTE 20 YRSago Re Bogus Rule 20 Affiant
was forcded to St. Peter and Brainard, where forced Depokate to harm injure, Shut up Sharon, Steal her Realestate, Reduce Sharon to Poveryty triggering Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles.
                     Affiant aka In re Scarrella4Justice221Nw2ND pg 562 Published
to make Non Lawyers 2nd Class Citizens, Denial Due Process.
                     Sharons 2nd Husband www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com
Murdered after 1 yr stay at Brainard.
                   THEREFORE WIDOW Mrs. Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-scarrella takes Issue with the Appointment of Retired Judges Specifically
                      HIGGS in the matter of Mrs. Darlene Winter Heinous
                       ASPHAUG  in the Wrongful Death or Murders of Rev
MaryJane Duchene and Alice Krengel  ie METZEN.
                       Flynn,Gearin,Johnson,smith  Retired HEINOUS ABUSE OF POWER,AUTHJORITY,JURISDICTION in the Andersons Committments, Due Process etc.
                      COMPLAINT under Construction
                          With all the Complaints vs. KNUTSON,PERKINS
ON THE WEB  its Bizzare re MS609.xx
                       THEREFORE LEGAL NOTICE OF RICO COMPLAINTS
ON FILE.
                     APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED JUDGE IS THE GRAVY TRAIN
CASH COW IN THE JUDICIAL BRANCH depriving Jury Trials and the Publics Right to know  COMMITTMENT SCAP PANEL IS A SECRET COURT.


From: Kyle.Christopherson@courts.state.mn.us
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent: 6/29/2016 12:09:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: RE: Candidate FilingsBillDahn53 SharonAnderson64WHISTLEBLOWERSQUITAMRELATORS ...

Here’s the order, Sharon.

Kyle Christopherson, Communications Specialist
Court Information Office
State Court Administrator's Office

Minnesota Judicial Branch
130-F Minnesota Judicial Center
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651-297-4029; Fax 651-268-1876
kyle.christopherson@courts.state.mn.us

From: Christopherson, Kyle
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:05 AM
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Subject: Re: Candidate FilingsBillDahn53 SharonAnderson64WHISTLEBLOWERSQUITAMRELATORS ...

I'm not sure, but I'll check for it daily.


In a message dated 6/1/2016 2:23:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Kyle.Christopherson@courts.state.mn.us writes:
I got your message, Sharon. There is no new appointment order yet. If you’d like, you can actually check on this yourself through our case management system: http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/publicLogin.jsp
 

1 to 1 of 1 records are displayed.
      


Search Results
javascript:postSortOrder('CsNumber', 'ASC'); Case Number javascript:postSortOrder('CsNumber', 'DESC');
javascript:postSortOrder('JurisDictionNm', 'ASC'); Jurisdiction javascript:postSortOrder('JurisdictionNm', 'DESC');
Short Title
javascript:postSortOrder('Description', 'ASC'); Status javascript:postSortOrder('Description', 'DESC');
javascript:postSortOrder('CsTypeNm', 'ASC'); Type javascript:postSortOrder('CsTypeNm', 'DESC');
javascript:postSortOrder('CsSubTypeNm', 'ASC'); SubType javascript:postSortOrder('CsSubTypeNm', 'DESC');
javascript:postSortOrder('SQLFileDt', 'ASC'); Filing Date javascript:postSortOrder('SQLFileDt', 'DESC');
Supreme Court
Judicial Appeal Panel - Appointments
Open
Project-Policy
Other
02/02/2009

1 to 1 of 1 records are displayed.
      

The case number for SCAP is ADM09-8003, which can be entered to access the documents related to the panel.

Kyle Christopherson, Communications Specialist
Court Information Office
State Court Administrator's Office

Minnesota Judicial Branch
130-F Minnesota Judicial Center
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651-297-4029; Fax 651-268-1876
kyle.christopherson@courts.state.mn.us

www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwtnZaIlfDg#t=26Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE CandidateMN Attorney General www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 2014 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=emailhttp://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdfhttp://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.htmlhttp://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.htmlhttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdfhttp://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdfwww.sharon4anderson.org http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdfhttp://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/POA http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdfhttp://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.comwww.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson


Sharon4Judge